MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902115385 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26707805

Additional file 1 of Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activity studies of two Co(II) complexes with 2-[(E)-(3-acetyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)diazenyl]-4-(2-hydroxyphenyl)thiophene-3-carboxylic acid as a ligand

2024· article· en· W6902115385 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrum (functional analysis)Mass spectrumSpectral lineCompound semiconductorHeteronuclear single quantum coherence spectroscopyInfrared spectroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Powder X-ray diffractogram of compound 11. Figure S2. UV-VIS spectrum of compound 11. Figure S3. IR spectrum of compound 11 with some assignments. Figure S4. HRESI+ mass spectrum of compound 11. Figure S5. 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 11. Figure S6. 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 11. Figure S7. HSQC spectrum of compound 11. Figure S8. COSY 1H-1H spectrum of compound 11 with some correlations. Figure S9. HMBC spectrum of compound 11. Figure S10. UV-VIS spectrum of complex 12. Figure S11. IR spectrum of complex 12. Figure S12. HRESI+ mass spectrum of complex 12. Figure S13. 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 12. Figure S14. 13C-NMR spectrum of complex 12. Figure S15. HSQC spectrum of complex 12 with some correlations. Figure S16. COSY 1H-1H spectrum of complex 12. Figure S17. HMBC spectrum of complex 12 with some correlations. Figure S18. Comparison of the UV-VIS spectra of compound 11 (black) and 12 (blue). Figure S19. Comparison of the IR spectra of compounds 11 (black) and 12 (blue). Figure S20. Comparison of the 1H-NMR spectra of compounds 11 (a) and 12 (b). Figure S21. Comparison of the 13C-NMR spectra of compounds 11 (a) and 12 (b). Figure S22. Powder X-ray diffractogram of compound 13. Figure S23. UV-VIS spectrum of compound 13. Figure S24. IR spectrum of compound 13. Figure S25. HRESI+ mass spectrum of compound 13. Figure S26. 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 13. Figure S27. 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 13. Figure S28. HSQC spectrum of compound 13 with some correlations. Figure S29. COSY 1H-1H spectrum of compound 13. Figure S30. HMBC spectrum of compound 13 with some correlations. Figure S31. Comparison of the powder X-ray diffractograms of compounds 11 (black) and 13 (green). Figure S32. Comparison of the UV-VIS spectra of compound 11 (black) and 13 (green). Figure S33. Comparison of the IR spectra of compounds 11 (black) and 13 (green). Figure S34. Comparison of the 1H-NMR spectra of compound 11 (a) and 13 (b). Figure S35. Comparison of the 13C-NMR spectra of compound 11 (a) and 13 (b).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2910.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207