MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902178841 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26633361

Additional file 1 of Profound DNA methylomic differences between single- and multi-fraction alpha irradiations of lung fibroblasts

2024· article· en· W6902178841 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of OttawaCanadian Nuclear Laboratories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsdNaMDNA methylationFibroblastDifferentially methylated regionsReprogrammingMethylationLungGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1. Figure S1: Minus-Average plots illustrating the number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) identified using various filters for statistical significance in α-irradiated fibroblasts. A DMRs detected in fibroblasts irradiated to single-fraction doses of α-particles. B DMRs detected in fibroblasts irradiated to multi-fraction doses of α-particles. Red, green, and gold dots indicate enriched regions with adjusted p value < 0.05, adjusted p value < 0.1, and raw p value <0.05, respectively. P values were adjusted for multiple testing using the false discovery rate method. Table S1: Parameters of the single-fraction α-irradiation using americium-241 sources in lung fibroblast cells. Table S2: Parameters of the 14-day multi-fraction α-irradiation equally delivered every 24 hours using americium-241 sources in lung fibroblast cells. Table S3: Number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in α-irradiated fibroblasts. The dose was delivered either as a singlefraction or equally distributed in 14 fractions (multi-fraction) with one fraction per day every 24 hours. The DMRs were generated using the MEDIPS package. The adjusted p values were computed using the false discovery rate (FDR) method. Table S4: Genes harboring the aging-associated differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in the α-irradiated lung fibroblasts. The total dose was delivered either as a single-fraction (SF) or 14-d multi-fraction (MF) every 24 hours. These events are based on the epigenetic chronological DNAm clock from Horvath [33] and the biological DNAm clock from Levine, et al. [34]. HypoDMRs, hypomethylated DMRs; hyperDMRs, hypermethylated DMRs; chr, chromosome. Table S5: The list of all differentially methylated regions (DMRs) located within the promoter site of the genome and their associated genes identified in the lung fibroblasts irradiated to single-fraction (SF) doses of α-particles. HypoDMRs, hypomethylated DMRs; HyperDMRs, hypermethylated DMRs; chr, chromosome. Table S6: The list of all differentially methylated regions (DMRs) located within the promoter site of the genome and their associated genes identified in the lung fibroblasts irradiated to multi-fraction (MF) doses of α-particles. Each fraction was equally delivered every 24 hours for 14 days. HypoDMRs, hypomethylated DMRs; HyperDMRs, hypermethylated DMRs; chr, chromosome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8330.118

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicEffects of Radiation ExposureFrench-language works237,207