MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902181599 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22612921

Additional file 2 of Determinants of substrate specificity in a catalytically diverse family of acyl-ACP thioesterases from plants

2023· article· en· W6902181599 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThioesteraseProtein Data Bank (RCSB PDB)HomotetramerCrystal structureCatalytic triadHydrolaseHomology modelingProtein structurePhosphodiester bondDimer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 2: Fig. S1. Predicted catalytic and acyl-binding cavity residues in modelled ALTs align with those of E. coli YbgC and Umbellularia californica FatB [45, 46, 48]. A. Monomer models of the hot-dog fold domains of MtALT1 and the E. coli acyl-CoA thioesterase YbgC, with numbered α-helices and β-strands. ALT monomers were modelled by AlphaFold 2.0, and the crystal structure of E. coli YbgC was retrieved from the RCSB PDB (PDB ID: 5 T06) [39, 40, 45]. B. Superimposition of Arabidopsis thaliana ALT3/4, Medicago truncatula ALT1/2, and Zea mays ALT1/3 homotetramer models assembled with HSYMDOCK (grey) with the crystal structure of the E. coli acyl-CoA thioesterase YbgC (yellow) [39–41, 45]. C. Comparison of predicted catalytic residues in modelled ALTs and the crystal structure of EcYbgC. AtALT4 is used as a representative example. Catalytic triad residues belong to two neighbouring subunits. D. Comparison of predicted acyl-binding cavity structure in modelled ALTs, and the crystal structures of EcYbgC and UcFatB. MtALT1 is used as a representative example. Ribbon structure of α1-α2 of the hot-dog fold domain is hidden from models to increase visibility of key residues. The crystal structure of UcFatB was retrieved from the RCSB PDB (PDB ID: 5X04), and the N-terminal hot-dog fold domain (residues 100–247) were isolated in ChimeraX 1.2.5 software. Top: Predicted substrate-binding cavity residues of MtALT1 and EcYbgC are shown as stick models. Middle: Molecular surfaces formed by predicted acyl binding cavity residues are coloured according to hydrophobicity (yellow = hydrophobic, white = amphipathic, blue = hydrophilic). Bottom: Predicted substrate-binding cavity residues of MtALT1, and experimentally determined substrate-binding cavity residues of UcFatB are shown as stick models [48]. E. Alignment of the MtALT1, EcYbgC, and N-terminal UcFatB hot-dog fold domain sequences [55]. Acyl-binding cavity residues belonging to each protein are highlighted in red [46]. Asterisks (*) indicate predicted acyl-binding cavity-forming residues of MtALT1 that align with those of both EcYbgC and UcFatB. Dots (●) indicate cavity-forming residues of MtALT1 that align with those of EcYbgC, but not UcFatB. Diamonds (◊) indicate cavity-forming residues of UcFatB that align structurally, but not on the sequence alignment, with those of MtALT1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207