MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6902201504 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23621562

Additional file 2 of mTORC1-mediated acquisition of reward-related representations by hippocampal somatostatin interneurons

2023· article· en· W6902201504 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrelationCorrelation coefficientPositive correlationNegative correlationPosition (finance)Hippocampal formationCorrelation function (quantum field theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 2: Figure S2. Deceleration correlation over training, and speed, acceleration, and deceleration correlations with mean learning index; and basal Ca2+ activity in SOM-Rptor-KO mice. A Mean correlation of Ca2+ activity with deceleration for all SOM-INs decreased at the end relative to the start of training in control but not in SOM-Rptor-KO mice. B Mean speed correlation as a function of mean learning index for all animals, showing correlation in control but not SOM-Rptor-KO mice. C Mean acceleration correlation as a function of mean learning index for all animals, showing absence of correlation. D Mean deceleration correlation as a function of mean learning index for all animals, showing correlation in control but not SOM-Rptor-KO mice. E Mean speed correlation as a function of mean place correlation for all animals, showing correlation in control but not SOM-Rptor-KO mice. F Examples of simultaneous measurements of position and Ca2+ responses during a training session from 7 SOM-INs of a control mouse and from 5 SOM-INs of a SOM-Rptor-KO mouse. G Ca2+ responses of a representative SOM-IN from a SOM-Rptor-KO mouse at start and end of training. Top: mean Ca2+ responsesand speed as function of position for all trials with reward zone indicated in green. Bottom: color-coded Ca2+ activity in each trial of the session, showing activity uncorrelated with position at the start and end of training. H Correlation of Ca2+ responses with position across laps at sessions 3 and 16, showing no place correlation at start and end of training. For each left: place correlation matrix of all paired laps. For each right: distribution of r values, mean r versus r distribution obtained by shuffling position measures. I-K Mean ΔF/F, mean standard deviation of ΔF/F and mean speed correlation in failed trials of the first 3 sessions of training, showing no difference between basal Ca2+ activity of SOM-INs of control and SOM-Rptor-KO mice during behavior-matched periods. L Mean spatial information content of SOM-IN activity during the last 3 sessions of training showing no difference between SOM-INs of control and SOM-Rptor-KO mice. Details of statistical tests provided in Additional file 5: Table S1. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns not significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8930.214

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicMemory and Neural Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→