MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902439889 · doi:10.7274/25571523

The Lifecycle of Marine Fog in the Coastal Zone

2024· dataset· en· W6902439889 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Notre Dame · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisibilityEvent (particle physics)Front (military)PeninsulaMarine debrisCold frontDebrisCoastal zoneNumerical weather prediction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fog is a collection of suspended water droplets or ice crystals in the atmospheric boundary layer that appears under favourable dynamic, thermodynamic, chemical, and surface conditions with visibility less than 1 km. Fog negatively affects society due to its ability to reduce visibility, which leads to economic losses of the same enormity of tornadoes. Notwithstanding extensive research, the ability to predict fog accurately is limited. Coastal fog is particularly difficult to predict because of the complex interactions between the lower atmosphere, upper ocean, and land surface. This dissertation presents several cases studies that aim to improve the understanding of coastal fog. The first part of the dissertation investigates a captivating fog dissipation event that was observed during the ’Fog and Turbulence Interactions in the Marine Atmosphere’ (FATIMA) project’s Grand Banks field campaign in the North Atlantic, where a fog-free region appeared immediately downstream of an islet (Sable Island) as fog advected past it. The second part concerns a mixing-fog event that appeared during the C-FOG field campaign off the coast of Newfoundland, Canada, where an oceanic cold front collided with a peninsula to produce misty/foggy conditions. In the third part of the dissertation, to aid fog prediction using numerical weather prediction models, a comprehensive set of laboratory experiments was conducted to quantify mixing as a function of the obstacle height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Notre DameFrench-language works237,207