MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902696147 · doi:10.7273/000002410

PREDATION RISK FOR HOARY MARMOTS IN THE CHANGING CLIMATE OF WASHINGTON’S NORTH CASCADES

2022· article· en· W6902696147 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWashington State University · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarmotPredationPredatorHabitatShrewVigilance (psychology)ForagingRoe deer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climatic changes can reduce habitat availability of high-elevation specialists such as the hoary marmot (Marmota caligata), a hibernating rodent of subalpine meadows and talus fields. Observed hoary marmot mean abundance in North Cascades National Park (NOCA) has declined by 74%, and though declines of other marmot populations have been attributed to increasing predation pressure, this relationship remains unexplored in NOCA. To examine the link between potential predators and hoary marmots in NOCA, I coupled surveys of hoary marmot vigilance behavior with estimates of predation risk based on predator diet composition and probability of use near hoary marmot colonies. We conducted 145 focal-animal surveys to determine the proportion of time hoary marmots spent vigilant. We surveyed 9,930 trap nights using 130 remote cameras and modeled predator occupancy using environmental covariates. We used genetic metabarcoding to identify predator and prey DNA in 413 scat samples. From camera traps and fecal DNA, we detected ten predator species in the study area, and we detected hoary marmots in the scats of five species. The proportion of observed hoary marmot predation was highest for coyotes (Canis latrans) (Χ2 = 31.78, p < 0.0001) at 50%. To our knowledge, we also report the first record of hoary marmots being consumed by Pacific martens (Martes caurina),which were also significant predators (proportion of observed consumption = 32%). Although I expected that predators with low-elevation habits would use sites with lower snow persistence, this prediction was supported only for coyotes, but not for other low-elevation predators. Combining probability of use estimates with observed hoary marmot consumption rates to develop a predation risk index, we found the risk was highest from Pacific martens (0.20) and lowest from Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) (< 0.01). However, estimates of predation risk and human use of sites did not explain the variation in hoary marmot vigilance, despite hoary marmots allocating > 50% of their time to vigilance. Our findings of consumption of hoary marmots by predators are similar to other studies of imperiled marmot populations, highlighting the need to better understand the effect of climate-driven shifts in predator-prey ecology in NOCA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it