MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902948287 · doi:10.7939/r3-9x7e-kq18

LONGITUDINAL SHEAR AND THERMAL RESISTANCE OF NOVEL AND CONVENTIONAL TIES IN CAVITY WALLS

2024· dissertation· en· W6902948287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasonryStiffnessShear wallFlexural strengthCavity wallTrussShear (geology)Composite numberSlip (aerodynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Double wythe masonry cavity walls consist of two masonry wythes, an exterior layer typically made of clay-backed or ceramic bricks (veneer) and the inner layer composed of concrete masonry units (CMU), which serves as a structural backup. In typical cavity wall design, the two wythes are assumed to share in resisting out-of-plane loads with the use of ties that resist the axial load. Cavity walls are subjected to vertical slip between the wythes producing longitudinal shear stresses in the ties. Literature shows that ties with the capacity to resist shear allow wythes to work together (i.e., composite action), leading to enhanced flexural stiffness and out-of-plane resistance of the wall (Mullins and O’Connor, 1987; Pacholok et al., 1989; Williams and Hamid, 2005). However, the Canadian standard for the design of masonry CSA A304-14 (2014a) does not have provisions for composite action in cavity walls.Considering composite action enables the possibility of designing wider cavities between the wythes to accommodate thicker insulation thickness. This is an approach to meet the growing energy efficiency standards outlined in the National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB, 2022), particularly in cold-weather regions. In such wide cavities, characterizing the strength and stiffness of such ties becomes important. Additionally, the thermal resistance of these wider cavity walls and the thermal bridging effects produced when using steel ties need to be investigated.A tie that consists of a truss geometry was developed to achieve larger shear strength and flexural stiffness compared with conventional ties. Longitudinal shear tests were conducted using 37 small-scale cavity walls to determine the shear strength and flexuraliiistiffness of three tie configurations: horizontally placed conventional (HC), vertically placed conventional (VC), and a novel tie (NC). The variables considered were the veneer brick type (clay and concrete) and the embedment length of the round bent bars attached to the ties and embedded within the veneer wythe (45, 60, and 75 mm). Results showed that the novel ties demonstrated larger flexural stiffness and peak load than conventional plate ties due a better material utilization (truss action). On average, the peak load for the HC, VC, and NC ties was 0.64, 1.74, and 4.32 kN and the flexural stiffness was 0.34, 0.47, and 0.71 kN/mm, respectively. Earlier crack propagation was observed in samples with clay bricks, while specimens with concrete bricks reached a larger peak load. Specimens with an embedment length of 75 mm reached the largest peak load. The larger strength of the novel tie enables it to be used with wider spacing in full walls. Since the novel tie is stiffer than other connectors, expansion joints should be provided to mitigate the effect of shrinkage in the inner and outer wythe.A Finite Element (FE) model was developed in the 3D FE software ANSYS to determine the thermal resistance (R-value) of wider cavity wall assemblies using both conventional and novel ties. The variables considered were the tie configuration (no tie, conventional tie, and novel tie), insulation thickness (100, 125, and 150 mm), and tie material (steel, stainless steel, and GFRP). Results showed that increasing the insulation thickness resulted in a larger R-value. The assemblies with novel and conventional ties reached similar R-values, this is explained as both ties have the same height and cross-sectional area and similar volume. The GFRP exhibited the largest R-value among the materials compared, this is due to the low thermal conductivity of the material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207