MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6902955915 · doi:10.7910/dvn/oevwcd

DesktopObjects-360

2025· dataset· en· W6902955915 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationBenchmark (surveying)Point (geometry)DeskKey (lock)Pattern recognition (psychology)Object (grammar)Annotation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dataset introduced in "PointGauss: Point Cloud-Guided Multi-Object Segmentation for Gaussian Splatting" DesktopObjects-360, a benchmark specifically designed for 3D segmentation for radiance field (3DGS and NeRF). The key features include: 1. The dataset provides COLMAP format data, making it directly applicable to 3DGS and NeRF modeling. 2. 3D Instance annotations are available for Gaussian models. 3. Pixel-level instance segmentation annotations are provided for 2D images. 4. The instance IDs for 2D and 3D objects remain consistent across different viewpoints. The dataset contains a total of 3,364 multi-view images with fine-grained 2D and 3D instance annotations. Each scene includes 7--10 object instances (56 annotated 3D instances in total), covering common desktop items under varying layouts and occlusions. To support instance segmentation tasks, we provide 26,042 pixel-accurate 2D instance masks across all scenes, with an average of 465 masks per 3D instance, ensuring dense and consistent multi-view correspondence. The DesktopObjects-360 dataset is organized in a hierarchical directory structure, with a root folder containing six subdirectories (Desk1 through Desk6) and one PointCloud.7z. Each Desk folder follows a consistent organization scheme, as exemplified by Desk1 which contains subfolders for 1. test data (Desk1_test), 2. original images (images), 3. segmentation masks (mask), 4. visualized masks (mask_visualize), 5. pretrained model annotations (annotated\_pretrained_model(2dgs)), 6. and a class label file (class.txt). In addition, we also provide pre-trained 2D Gaussian Splatting (2DGS) models with annotations for 10 scenes from the Nerds360 dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207