Computational Insight into the Carbenic Character of Nitrilimines from a Reactivity Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nitrilimines (RCNNR) can be described through a carbenic valence bond structure, and although intermolecular carbenic reactions from nitrilimines are unknown, intramolecular reaction products from ortho-vinyl MeCOOCNNPh (<b>1</b>) and PhCNNPh (<b>2</b>) that seem to have followed two typical carbene reaction mechanisms, [1+2] cycloaddition and CH insertion, have been reported. This study sheds light on whether such reaction mechanisms are tenable, using the electron density and its Laplacian (QTAIM), natural bond orbital (NBO) descriptions, and reaction profiles. It is shown that the reaction in <b>1</b> is distinctly different from the [1+2] cycloadditions of ethene with the typical singlet carbene CF<sub>2</sub> and the nitrilimine FCNNF with its large carbenic character, and the formal [1+2] cycloaddition product from <b>1</b> is in fact not the primary product. Similarly, it is shown that the reaction in <b>2</b> is fundamentally different from the CH insertions of CF<sub>2</sub>, FCNNF, and even HCNNH with its small carbenic character into methane, and again the formal CH insertion product from <b>2</b> is not the primary product. The small model reactions from CF<sub>2</sub>, FCNNF, and HCNNH were analyzed using B3LYP, MP2, and B2PLYP with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set, whereas the full study was performed with B3LYP/6-31+G(2d,2p), as it was shown to be sufficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.358 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".