MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6903182371 · doi:10.1139/cjss2012-008

Controlled release fertilizer product effects on potato crop response and nitrous oxide emissions under rain-fed production on a medium-textured soil

2012· article· en· W6903182371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBioOne Complete (BioOne) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFertilizerLeaching (pedology)Nitrous oxideDiammonium phosphateNitrateAmmonium nitrateAmmonia volatilization from ureaControlled releaseCrop yield

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zebarth, B. J., Snowdon, E., Burton, D. L., Goyer, C. and Dowbenko, R. 2012. Controlled release fertilizer product effects on potato crop response and nitrous oxide emissions under rain-fed production on a medium-textured soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 92: 759-769. Controlled release fertilizers and split fertilizer N applications are expected to provide plant-available nitrogen (N) in synchrony with crop requirements, which should mitigate nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from agricultural soils. This study compared a polymer coated urea (PCU) controlled release N fertilizer (Environmentally Smart Nitrogen), split fertilizer N application and conventional fertilizer N management on the crop response and growing season N2O emissions from rain-fed potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production on a medium-textured soil in Atlantic Canada from 2008 to 2010. Fertilizer were applied at the recommended rate (193 kg N ha-1) and treatments included the PCU product banded at planting, conventional fertilizer in a split application (60% as diammonium phosphate plus ammonium nitrate at planting plus 40% as ammonium nitrate at final hilling), conventional fertilizer (diammonium phosphate plus ammonium nitrate) banded at planting, and an unfertilized control. Within each year, cumulative growing season N2O emissions were closely related to soil nitrate availability as measured by nitrate exposure (sum of daily nitrate concentration in the surface soil). Split N application had no effect on crop response, and significantly reduced nitrate exposure, but did not reduce N2O emissions. With the PCU, there was evidence of increased plant N availability and greater N2O emissions. In situations where the risk of nitrate leaching is limited, substitution of a PCU product for conventional fertilizer at the same N application rate will not necessarily reduce growing season N2O emissions and may in some cases increase the risk of N2O emissions. Further research is required to determine if lowering N rates with PCU products will be effective agronomically and environmentally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioOne Complete (BioOne)Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207