MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6903235880 · doi:10.11575/prism/37103

Effect of age, sex and aerobic exercise on cerebrovascular regulation in older adults: Results from the Brain in Motion Study

2019· other· en· W6903235880 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical exercisePopulationAerobic exerciseBlood pressureHypercapniaBrachial artery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: By 2024, 20% of Canada’s population will be 65 and older. Aging is associated with progressive declines in cerebrovascular and cognitive function and an increased prevalence of age-related diseases such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Physical activity has been associated with improvements in cerebrovascular function and cognitive performance, and may help to prevent and/or delay AD. However, the underlying time-course by which enhanced physical activity may be protective for brain health and differences between men and women is poorly understood. Objective: To determine the influence of age and sex on the cerebrovascular responses to submaximal exercise and euoxic hypercapnia in older adults. Furthermore, this study assessed the effects of a 6-month aerobic exercise intervention on cerebrovascular measures and evaluated outcomes after three and six months of exercise. Design: 202 participants aged 66.5 ± 6.5 years (mean ± SD, 101 females) completed the aerobic exercise intervention. Measurements took place pre-, mid- and post-intervention including demographic information, maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) and cerebrovascular function. Linear mixed models adjusted for covariates were used to measure the physiological responses to submaximal exercise and euoxic hypercapnia pre-intervention and the changes in middle cerebral artery peak blood flow velocity (VP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cerebrovascular resistance (CVRi) and conductance (CVCi) indices after three and six months of aerobic exercise. Results: Pre-intervention, both age and sex were significant predictors of VP (p=0.002; p<0.010), CVRi (p<0.001; p=0.029), and CVCi (p<0.001; p=0.004) during exercise. Compared to rest, acute exercise led to increases in VP, CVRi and MAP and decreases in CVCi (p<0.001). Three months of aerobic exercise led to increases in VP (p=0.005) and CVCi (p=0.021) and decreases in CVRi (p=0.002) in women only, with no further changes observed after an additional three months of exercise. Conclusion: Male sex and increasing age were associated with lower VP, CVCi and higher CVRi. Three months of aerobic exercise led to improvements in cerebrovascular measures in women that were maintained in the latter three months of the intervention in healthy, older adults. Such results have important implications for the role of physical activity in improving health outcomes and the differences observed with aging and sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→