MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6903287012 · doi:10.11575/prism/49546

Grassroots Community Engagement: A Collaborative Approach for Mitigating Senior Isolation in Bangladeshi Community in Edmonton

2023· other· en· W6903287012 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrassrootsCommunity engagementIsolation (microbiology)Social isolationFocus groupBaseline (sea)Psychological interventionPopulationIndigenous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Senior isolation presents a pressing challenge with implications for the mental, physical, and emotional well-being of immigrant and ethnocultural communities in Canada (Seniors Social Isolation in Canada, n.d.). This abstract advocates for grassroots community engagement to uncover factors contributing to senior isolation in the Bangladeshi Community in Edmonton and to cocreate solutions that resonate with the community's cultural nuances. Methods: This root-level community engagement model extends beyond data collection to involve seniors in co-creating activities or intervention strategies through senior involvement. First, we will collaborate with root-level Bangladeshi community organizations in Edmonton to reach out to the seniors. Recruited seniors will share their experiences, challenges, and aspirations related to isolation. They will be engaged in planning and organizing activities that will be culturally tailored to enhance integration into the new Canadian culture and combat senior isolation. Observations: The impact of community engagement will be evaluated through regular focus groups, interviews, and surveys of the target population where we will capture their perceptions, experiences, and any observed changes. Prior to implementing the activities tailored by the seniors, a baseline assessment of the seniors' levels of isolation, social engagement, and well-being will be conducted. Finally, a comparison will be made between the baseline assessment and the post-intervention data to identify changes and trends. This analysis will help determine whether the activities have effectively addressed senior isolation and contributed to improved outcomes. Conclusion: Through this grassroots community engagement, a platform will be established to empower seniors, enable cultural preservation, and foster meaningful connections for a more inclusive and cohesive society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicHealth disparities and outcomes→French-language works237,207→