Anthraquinone-Based Discotic Liquid Crystals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The syntheses of six room-temperature discotic liquid crystals based on an alkoxy-anthraquinone (AQ) framework is described. Differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and cross-polarized microscopy were used to identify phases and confirm phase-transition temperatures. Cross-polarized microscopy results suggest columnar discotic structures at room temperature. However, the AQ derivatives also undergo mesophase-to-mesophase transitions, which are attributed to rectangular- to hexagonal-columnar discotic transitions based on XRD analysis. Furthermore, some of the compounds display remarkable liquid crystalline phase stability that spans from −50 to 150 °C, a useful temperature range for organic materials applications. The different AQ derivatives did not exhibit electronic perturbations, as all compounds have absorption onsets of approximately 400 nm. Finally, solution cyclic voltammetry of the AQ derivatives was carried out to determine the redox potentials, diffusion coefficients, and electron transfer rate constants. All AQ derivatives had <i>E</i><sub>1/2</sub> values that ranged between −1.52 and −1.70 V vs Fc/Fc<sup>+</sup>. Diffusion coefficients and electron transfer rates for all AQ derivatives ranged between 0.4 and 7.1 × 10<sup>−6</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>·s<sup>−1</sup> and 0.9 and 5.2 × 10<sup>−3</sup> cm·s<sup>−1</sup>, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.571 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".