MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6903365519 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2025.3590630

Stability Assessment of Multi-Rate Electromagnetic Transient Simulations

2025· article· en· W6903365519 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Stability (learning theory)Control theory (sociology)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsRepresentation (politics)Numerical stabilityTransient analysisElectromagnetic simulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-rate Electromagnetic Transient (EMT) simulations use smaller time-steps for parts of the network requiring greater accuracy, and larger time-steps for the rest of the network. This paper presents an analytical approach for evaluating the stability of multi-rate EMT simulations of linear time-invariant (LTI) networks. It is shown that their resulting discrete time system is inherently time-periodic. Leveraging this characteristic, a sampled-data time-invariant representation of the simulated network is derived. The overall simulation’s numerical stability can then be assessed through eigenvalue analysis. The paper shows that contrary to popular belief, a multi-rate EMT simulation may become unstable even if the well-known A-stable trapezoidal rule is used. The proposed approach is validated with example simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207