MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Association between Female Reproductive Factors and Subjective and Objective Cognitive Function: a Cross-sectional Analysis from the Pingyin Cohort

2025· article· en· W6903368304 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionLogistic regressionAnthropometryBreastfeedingPopulationCohortCohort studyEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceCluster sampling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The association between female reproductive factors and cognitive function was unclear, there still lack studies on female reproductive factors and subjective cognitive function. Objective Exploring the relationship between female reproductive factors and subjective or objective cognitive function, and providing theoretical basis for the prevention and intervention of cognitive decline and dementia. Methods The baseline survey was conducted in July 2023 in Pingyin, Jinan (in three townships). After using a multi-stage cluster random sampling method, 2 165 valid participants aged 45-70 were recruited at baseline. We collected sociodemographic data, medical histories, lifestyle factors, and female reproductive factors through a self-designed comprehensive questionnaire. The subjective and objective cognitive function of participants were evaluated by the Subjective Cognitive Decline-Questionnaire 9 (SCD-Q9) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale-Basic (MoCA-B), respectively. In addition, we also collected anthropometric data (included height and weight) and blood samples (to get APOE e4 alleles). Multivariate Logistic regression and Local weighted regression (Loess) were used to analyze the influence of female reproductive factors on cognitive function and to detect potential nonlinear relationships between age at menarche, age at menopause, length of reproductive period and MoCA-B scores. Results This study was based on a baseline population and included 1 044 postmenopausal women. The prevalence of abnormal SCD-Q9 scores was 48.37% (505/1 044), while the prevalence of abnormal MoCA-B scores was 67.43% (704/1 044). Women who had 3 or more children had a lower risk of subjective cognitive decline compared with those who had 1 or fewer children (OR=0.59, 95%CI=0.36-0.98). Women with a breastfeeding duration <6 months had a higher risk of subjective cognitive decline compared with those with a breastfeeding duration of 6-12 months (OR=3.69, 95%CI=1.03-13.16). Age at menarche >18 years (OR=1.91, 95%CI=1.09-3.35), age at menopause ≤45 years (OR=1.61, 95%CI=1.00-2.62), and reproductive period ≤30 years (OR=1.56, 95%CI=1.07-2.29) or >40 years (OR=2.22, 95%CI=1.05-4.72) were all associated with poorer objective cognitive function (P<0.05). Loess analysis revealed an inverted "J-shaped" relationship between age at menarche, age at menopause, reproductive period and MoCA-B scores. Conclusion Women with more children (≥3) have a lower risk of subjective cognitive decline and women with shorter breastfeeding duration (<6 months) have a higher risk of subjective cognitive decline. Age at menarche >18 years, early menopause (≤45 years), and excessively long or short reproductive periods are all associated with poorer objective cognitive function. We should pay attention to the influence of female reproductive factors on cognitive function in order to delay the process of cognitive decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments→French-language works237,207→