MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6903479902 · doi:10.1177/16094069251360308

“If I Were in his Shoes”: Photo-Prompted Storytelling in Interviews With People Living With Dementia

2025· article· en· W6903479902 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsResearch Institute for AgingUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStorytellingDementiaInterviewQualitative researchObservational studyScale (ratio)Content analysisQualitative property

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Supportive approaches to engaging with people living with dementia in research are needed to ensure that research methods are accessible to and incorporate the experiences of people living with dementia. This study sought to explore how the use of a photo-prompted storytelling technique impacted both the data collected as well as the engagement of people living with dementia in research during the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined an underutilized research method for supporting the engagement of people with dementia in qualitative research through involving participants in constructing a story about a character (Frank) using photos. Methods: This paper presents findings from a project which employed different interviewing techniques with people with dementia. Video recordings of interviews were used to facilitate observation of the engagement of participants in interviews. An observational scale was used to examine the engagement of participants in the interviews. Results: A total of 12 people living with dementia participated in this study. Qualitative content analysis resulted in the identification of several key areas of impact. When interviewed with the photo-prompted storytelling technique, participants tended to engage in reflection of their own experiences and beyond, and the photo-prompted storytelling technique also supported challenges with direct questioning and recall. It was also identified that there were content differences related to the photograph prompts. There was a statistically significant difference in engagement scores when participants were interviewed using photo-prompted storytelling techniques. Conclusion: Findings from this study reinforce the utility of photo-prompted storytelling techniques in supporting the participation people with dementia in qualitative interviews. These techniques may impact the types of data collected through interviews, as well as the engagement of people with dementia in interviews. Further research is needed to determine the impact of specific photograph prompts, as well as applications in a broader range of people living with dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.760
GPT teacher head0.724
Teacher spread0.035 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Qualitative MethodsSame topicParticipatory Visual Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207