MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

File S1 - <i>MTHFR</i> Glu429Ala and <i>ERCC5</i> His46His Polymorphisms Are Associated with Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Analysis of Two Independent Cohorts from Newfoundland

2015· dataset· en· W6904432586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University) · 2015
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeGenotypingSNPPopulationAlleleColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p><b>Supporting information.</b> Figure S1 The circled SNP is rs1801131 (<i>MTHFR</i> Glu429Ala), which lies in a 12kb LD block. The black squares indicate other highly correlated SNPs (r<sup>2</sup>>0.80). Figure S2 The circled SNP is rs1046678 (<i>ERCC5</i> His46His), which lies in a 23kb LD block. The black squares indicate other highly correlated SNPs (r<sup>2</sup>>0.80). Table S1 n: number. Table S2 <sup>*</sup>Assay ID by Applied Biosystems (CA, USA). Underlined are the sequences on probes that are complementary to alleles they recognize. Assays for rs1799750 in <i>MMP1</i> gene and rs1799889 in <i>SERPINE1</i> gene were custom designed. Assays for rs1801131 in <i>MTHFR</i> gene and rs1047768 in <i>ERCC5</i> gene were predesigned by Applied Biosystems. Primer and probe sequences for these assays are not available since they are proprietary of Applied Biosystems. Seq: sequence. Table S3 n/a: not applicable. Polymorphisms with χ2 value greater than 3.84 were considered to be deviating from HWE (p<0.05). *For these gene deletions, since heterozygote genotype cannot be determined by the genotyping method applied, HWE was not calculated. All polymorphisms were investigated in this study regardless of their deviations from the HWE as these deviations may also be attributed to the fact that the Newfoundland population is considered a genetically isolated population <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0061469#pone.0061469-Kweekel1" target="_blank">[49]</a>. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that while the <i>OGG1</i> Ser326Cys polymorphism that deviated from the HWE was included in the DFS multivariable model of the discovery cohort, its genotype data was not available for the validation cohort patients. Thus, the main conclusion on the disease-free survival analysis that the <i>ERCC5</i> His46His polymorphism was associated with DFS in both the discovery and the validation patient cohorts is not affected by including this polymorphism in the DFS analysis of the discovery cohort. Table S4 CI: confidence interval, HR: hazard ratio, MSI: microsatellite instability, n: number of patients, vs: versus. Table S5 CI: confidence interval, HR: hazard ratio, MSI: microsatellite instability, n: number of patients, vs: versus. Table S6 CI: confidence interval, HR: hazard ratio, MSI: microsatellite instability, n: number of patients, vs: versus. Table S7 CI: confidence interval, HR: hazard ratio, MSI: microsatellite instability, n: number of patients, vs: versus. Methods S1 Genotyping reactions. Methods S2 Construction of linkage disequilibrium (LD) maps.</p> <p>(DOC)</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)French-language works237,207