Bibliographic record
Abstract
• British Columbia Almanac by Mark Forsythe -Reviewed by Anne Moon (pgs: 90-1) • The Way We Were: B.C.'s Amazing Journey to the Millennium by Staff of the Province -Reviewed by Mark Forsythe (pgs: 91-3) • Historical Atlas of British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest: Maps of Exploration by Derek Hayes -Reviewed by Peter H. Wood (pgs: 93-4) • Islands of Truth: The Imperial Fashioning of Vancouver Island by Daniel W. Clayton -Reviewed by Richard White (pgs: 94-7) • Long Day's Journey: The Steamboat and Stagecoach Era in the Northern West by Carlos Arnaldo Schwantes • The Frontier World of Edgar Dewdney by Brian Titley -Reviewed by Patrick A. Dunae (pgs: 98-100) • The Lord's Distant Vineyard: A History of the Oblates and the Catholic Community in British Columbiaby Vincent J. McNally -Reviewed by Kevin Beliveau (pgs: 101-2) • Domestic Goods: The Material, the Moral, and the Economic in the Postwar Years by Joy Parr -Reviewed by Douglas Owram (pgs: 103-5) • The Sommers Scandal: The Felling of Trees and Tree Lords by Betty O'Keefe, Ian McDonald -Reviewed by David Mitchell (pgs: 105-6) • Pepper in Our Eyes: The APEC Affair by Wedley Pue -Reviewed by Pat Marchak (pgs: 106-8) • The Politics of Resentment: British Columbia Regionalism and Canadian Unity by Philip Resnick -Reviewed by Stephane Levesque (pgs: 108-9) • The Gurus Gift: An Ethnography Exploring Gender Equality with North American Sikh Women by Cynthia Mahmood, Stacy Brady -Reviewed by Anita Parhar (pgs: 110-11) • Gilean Douglas: Writing Nature, Finding Home by Andrea Lebowitz, Gillian Milton -Reviewed by Sue Wheeler (pgs: 111-2)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.583 | 0.577 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".