MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906444352 · doi:10.17045/sthlmuni.27020581

Dataset on the expression "Canadian model" in the Swedish Press and student papers (2021-2023)

2024· dataset· en· W6906444352 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStockholm University Figshare Repository · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperSection (typography)MetadataHeadlineContent analysisPublishingExpression (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset is part of a study exploring representations of the "Canadian model" in Swedish media and among students enrolled in Canadian Studies courses at Stockholm University. The data covers media articles, radio transcripts, and anonymized student essays collected between 2021 and 2023. It includes qualitative and quantitative content, focusing on discourse analysis of how the "Canadian model" is portrayed in social, political, and academic contexts.<b>Swedish Media Corpus (2021-2023):</b><br>This section contains articles from various Swedish newspapers as well as radio transcripts that mention the "Canadian model" or similar terms such as "kanadensisk modell" and "kanadensisk förebild." The media content was sourced from the Mediearkivet database and the National Library of Sweden. The list of articles (from Mediearkivet) is present but for copyright issues, we were not allowed to attach the whole articles.<br><b>Student Papers on Canadian Studies (2021-2023):</b><br>This section includes anonymized essays written by students from Stockholm University as part of an introductory course on Canadian Studies. Each essay engages with the concept of the "Canadian model," responding to a quote from Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The student papers are available in text format (PDF/Word) and are provided with metadata that includes the year of submission and the total word count. The collection comprises a total of 155,692 words across 87 student essays. This dataset is available for academic research purposes under the terms of a Creative Commons license. All data has been anonymized in accordance with GDPR principles, and no personal identifiers are included. A course plan corresponding to the course at the basic level has also been added.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStockholm University Figshare RepositoryFrench-language works237,207