MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906472133 · doi:10.17603/ds2-sqf4-9k45

Green social work educational resources in Canada

2022· dataset· en· W6906472133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTexas Advanced Computing Center · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumWork (physics)SustainabilitySocial workSocial mediaSocial network (sociolinguistics)Social sustainabilityFocus group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Green social work (GSW) is a relatively new framework within social work. The primary objective of this approach is to integrate an environmental focus. GSW aims to address economic oppression, engage in disaster resilience, and sustainable practices. The project GSW Education in Canada aims to comprehensively examine the Canadian schools of social work programs (Bachelor, Master, and Ph.D.), related courses, areas of faculty specialization, and placement opportunities. This project examines the level of GSW teaching and knowledge mobilization in the Canadian social work educational system. Consequently, through website keywords (e.g., climate change, disaster, environment, green social work, and sustainability) searching, data from the academic institutions’ official websites for 45 universities and colleges were collected. These data include (1) course descriptions, (2) faculty members areas of research and/or practice, (3) when possible, social work field placement opportunities. The first iteration of this data included information about faculty members, including name and research or practice specialization. However, faculty members’ data is not able to be published due to privacy and ethical concerns. This data set emphasizes the Canadian post-secondary institutions’ emphasis or lack of focus on GSW. This information might encourage schools of social work and faculty members to promote GSW research, teaching, and practice through integrating disaster response, climate change, and sustainability practices. International and Canadian social work researchers could use this data to identify future research collaborations across Canadian geographical areas where GSW curricula can be further developed. Prospective social work students can use this data to find GSW-related programs and courses and network with faculty members with related research interests. For the public, this data can provide information about social work courses and curricula across Canada and highlight the scholars with relevant expertise amongst the institutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0200.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTexas Advanced Computing CenterFrench-language works237,207