MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906614365 · doi:10.17632/dtz5tvy66r.2

embodiedPerspective

2025· dataset· en· W6906614365 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecuneusAngular gyrusPerspective (graphical)Embodied cognitionEncoding (memory)RecallVisual memoryScripting language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This folder contains scripts and results detailed in "An embodied perspective: angular gyrus and precuneus decode selfhood in memories of naturalistic events" by Heather Iriye and Peggy L. St. Jacques. We investigated the interaction between embodiment and visual perspective during encoding, and how this interplay shapes the recall of past events. We hypothesized that the angular gyrus, precuneus, and hippocampus would be involved in integrating the visual perspective and sense of embodiment initially present during memory encoding within memories for naturalistic events as they were retrieved from memory. Patterns of activity during retrieval in the left angular gyrus and bilateral precuneus predicted embodiment on its own separated from visual perspective. In contrast, we observed only inconclusive evidence that these posterior parietal regions predicted visual perspective independent of embodiment. While the left angular gyrus distinguished between in-body and out-of-body perspectives during the retrieval of events associated with both strong and weak embodiment, decoding accuracy predicting visual perspective was only above chance for events encoded with strong embodiment in the precuneus bilaterally. Our results suggest that the contribution of posterior parietal regions in establishing visual perspectives within memories is tightly interconnected with embodiment. Encoding events from an embodied in-body perspective compared to embodied out-of-body perspective led to higher memory accuracy following repeated retrieval. These results elucidate how fundamental feelings of being located in and experiencing the world from our own body’s perspective are integrated within memory. scripts subfolder: run_crossvalidation_measure_ROI_ST_final.m - Matlab script to perform ROI decoding analyses using the CoSMoMVPA toolbox. ROIs subfolder: Contains binarized ROI masks of the left and right angular gyrus, precuneus, and hippocampus. results subfolder: behavioralResults.csv - results of the illusion induction questionnaire and cued recall test/subjective ratings from immediate testing, scanning, and post-scanning sessions. decodingAccuraciesSingleHemiAll.xlsx - results of the ROI decoding analyses with one tab per analysis Abbreviations: Sess1 = session one (immediate testing) Scan = scanning session Sess2 = session 2 (post-scanning) illMinCont = average illusion minus control statement ratings Corr = cued recall accuracy (proportion correct) Viv = vividness EI = emotional intensity Belief = belief in memory accuracy InBodyRat = average 1PP rating OutofBodyRat = average 3PP rating accLDA = LDA classifier accuracy accMinChLDA = accuracy minus chance LDA classifier sscore

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0080.007
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207