MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906653115 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/ef43j

RAISE TSC Evaluation

2019· other· en· W6906653115 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAir Traffic Management and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Field (mathematics)Work (physics)Margin (machine learning)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: There is limited evidence describing how to build capacity for health policy and systems research (HSPR) in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). The WHO HPSR Alliance (The Alliance) developed the Research to Enhance the Adaptation and Implementation of Health Systems Guidelines (RAISE) initiative. The RAISE initiative aims to build capacity for HSPR in LMICs and supports six LMIC research teams using HSPR to adapt and/or implement health systems guidelines within a two-year funding period. The Alliance commissioned the Knowledge Translation (KT) Program at St. Michael's Hospital-Unity Health Toronto to act as a Technical Support Centre (TSC) to provide ongoing scientific support and capacity building for the RAISE teams. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to (1) develop, monitor and evaluate the TSC capacity building program; (2) determine the impact of the TSC activities on research capacity and practice, and impact of the RAISE initiative on stakeholder engagement, guideline adaptation, and implementation; and (3) advance the science on common barriers and facilitators faced by LMICs who aim to adapt and implement health systems guidelines. Methods: The TSC provides interventions to support capacity building, including: in-person workshops, an online webinar series, online discussion boards, in-country visits and ongoing communication and coaching calls with the RAISE teams. Using a mixed methods approach, we will administer surveys, conduct key informant interviews and perform a document review to achieve the study objectives. Outcomes of Interest: We will describe our process of iteratively adapting the support provided based on the needs identified by the RAISE teams. Additionally, we will evaluate the implementation quality of the TSC capacity building program, researchers’ and knowledge users’ self-efficacy in KT research utilization, perceived impact of the RAISE portfolio on stakeholder engagement, guideline adaptation, and implementation, and barriers and facilitators to health systems guideline adaptation and/or implementation in LMICs. Anticipated impact: This research will advance the science on a) capacity building for HSPR and KT and b) common barriers and facilitators to health system guideline implementation in LMICs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8060.889

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)Same topicAir Traffic Management and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207