Preceitos para uma Arte Edificante: pintura e gravura na corte josefina através da obra de António Joaquim Padrão (c. 1730-1771)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research it isn't confined to António Joaquim Padrão (c. 1730-71) – marginal personality in the portuguese capital artistic scene, yet with a independent workshop operating in the city during the third quarter of the eighteenth century, working has a painter and engraver – historical-biographical reconstruction, nor to his artistic corpus and simultaneously with that of his peers from an aesthetic point of view. It also concerns the understanding of the nature, evolution, use and context of distinctive types of body language in religious and portrait genres, in light of images instructive potencial within Catholicism and regime. In the first and second parts of this study we attend to the individual and family past, in private, public and profissional perspectives (origins, social status, educational degree, household, health, artistic training, friends circle, client portfolio, contacts, works, aesthetic thought). The collect data helped clarify the apparent contradiction of seeing him – follower or practitioner of the Court most cherished aesthetic, formed in the main workshop of the capital (André Gonçalves), consorted with the first regal painter (Vieira Lusitano) in engraved entreprises, friend of friar Manuel do Cenáculo (one of the most enlightened minds in the country and a prominent figure in the Court) – apart from the most import works that were starting in the rebuilted city religious temples and, at the same time, keeping his workshop active. The last part is committed to the analysis of the most esteemed elements of the roman late-Baroque in our country (with no significant difference from the international scene), basis of success and reasons for continuity (right dose of classicism, baroque and Renaissance canon of beauty; virtuous and sensitive language referentials of the human figure, like modesty, humility, pudency).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".