MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906697708 · doi:10.17632/dkpnsv4g5m

Ethics in Archaeology Teaching Study: Survey of 2023 Anthropology Program Requirements

2024· dataset· en· W6906697708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstitutionSample (material)Graduate studentsHigher educationResearch ethicsCurriculumData collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a a de-identified, sanitized copy of survey data from our Ethics in Archaeology Teaching Study that looked at United States Anthropology Programs with majors or minors in 2023. Data collection for this study was overseen by Carleton College’s Institutional Review Board (IRB 2021-22 1368 SKENNEDY2). Funding was made possible through Carleton College’s Student Research Assistantship program. This survey data was collected by Ezra Kucur in 2023, and updated throughout 2023-2024. Our sample was derived from a list of 827 U.S. colleges and universities with undergraduate anthropology programs from the American Anthropological Association’s AnthroGuide, as observed in 2023 when we created the initial sample group (https://guide.americananthro.org/39/Degree-Programs). The AnthroGuide lists 827 total programs offering anthropology across both undergraduate and graduate programs in the United States and Canada. From the list of 827, we extracted the 637 institutions that were based in the U.S. that included undergraduate programs (major and/or minor) including associates/2-year degrees and combined graduate-undergraduate institutions. From there, we classified the 637 institutions according to their status as Predominantly/Historically White Institutions (PWIs) and Minority Serving Institutions (MSI), based on the categories curated by the MSI Data Project, a publicly accessible digital research initiative that aims to further advance minority-serving institutions and their unique contributions to higher education (https://www.msidata.org). We have redacted the name of each institution, as well as publicly visible course numbers, course descriptions, and our notes. The institutions are now named randomly with consecutive numbers from 1-222. This dataset includes the following information for each of the 222 institutions: Carnegie Institution Type, General Institution Type, MSI designation, and presence or absence of anthropology major, anthropology minor, requirements or learning objectives, ethics requirements, ethics electives, anthropology ethics electives, and courses listed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Open science, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0070.016
Research integrity0.0010.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.344
GPT teacher head0.521
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207