MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6908327090 · doi:10.25946/15088170

Market analysis of caraway seed

2021· report· en· W6908327090 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCentral Queensland University · 2021
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDestinationsApiaceaeAgricultureCropInternational marketDescriptive statisticsTourismHerbBaseline (sea)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the current state of the international and Australian caraway market and explores the market opportunities for Australian caraway producers. It provides a baseline assessment of the global industry, using the limited information currently available, and identifies areas for further research. The report is based on the data and literature available through secondary sources including the databases of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Trade Organization(WTO), United Nations International Trade Statistics Database (UN ComTrade) and the World Bank. The market data available for caraway is limited and is often presented in a larger group of spices including juniper, anise, badian and fennel as a whole seed (not ground or crushed). It is not possible to separate the individual spices from this grouped data so in these instances the overarching trends have been assessed. Caraway (Carum carvi L.) is a small herb belonging to the Apiaceae family and is a biennial crop (Malhotra, 2012). Caraway fruit, which is known as caraway seed, are oblong with five pale ridges, brown in colour and about 3-6 mm long (Malhotra, 2012). The dried fruits of caraway are commonly used as a spice in baking and cooking, are believed to hold medicinal properties, and the essential oil of caraway is used in different types of liqueurs for flavouring (Shelef, 2003). Caraway is cultivated in many parts of the world, with Finland and Canada the largest exporting countries with the leading market destinations being India, Germany and the US. Significant price variations exist in international markets, depending on the crop’s origin, with the average price of Canadian spices over US$1,750/tonne, whereas the price of Indian caraway was only US$1,266/tonne (ITC, 2019, UN ComTrade, 2019). Price variation could also be due to cost of production in the source country. Australia’s domestic market for caraway and other similar spices is entirely supplied through imports. In 2018, Australia imported about 568 tonne of the caraway spice group (juniper, anise, badian, caraway, fennel), worth about US$1.37million. About 70% of imported spices in Australia were sourced from India and China (UN Com Trade, 2019). In 2018 Australia’s import price for the group of spices was US$2,408/tonne. Given the unit value and the size of the market, it is likely that it would be favourable for local industry in Australia to initially target the domestic market before scaling up for international markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCentral Queensland UniversityFrench-language works237,207