MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6908486371 · doi:10.26262/heal.auth.ir.344278

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2023· article· en· W6908486371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAristotle University of Thessaloniki · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeptum secundumAsymptomaticOdds ratioRegurgitation (circulation)Closure (psychology)Confidence intervalCohortMeta-analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the establishment of transcatheter closure as the treatment of choice in adults with secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs), the effectiveness of this approach in elderly is disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis involved studies exploring the impact of transcatheter ASD closure in patients ≥60 years old. We systematically searched four major databases, including PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science. ClinicalTrials.gov, references of the selected articles as well as sources of grey literature were also hand-searched. Primary outcomes were the right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, whereas secondary outcomes included the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP), plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) levels, tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR), atrial arrhythmias, and mortality. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the studies’ quality. Eighteen observational cohort studies with 1184 patients were included in the meta-analysis. RVEDD was significantly reduced after ASD closure (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.9, 95% confidence intervals [CI] -1.2; -0.7). Elderly patients had 9.5 times higher odds of being asymptomatic after versus before ASD closure (95% CI 5.06; 17.79). Furthermore, transcatheter ASD closure significantly improved LVEDD (SMD 0.8, 95% CI 0.7; 1.0), sPAP (mean difference [MD] 10.8, 95% CI -14.6; -7), TR severity (odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.25; 0.60) and BNP levels (MD 68.3, 95% CI -114.4; -22.1). There was no effect of ASD closure on atrial arrhythmias (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.42; 1.88), while overall mortality after ASD closure yielded a pooled proportion of 0.10 (95% CI 0.06; 0.16). Transcatheter ASD closure improved functional capacity, right and left ventricular dimensions, sPAP, TR, BNP levels without increasing the likelihood of atrial arrhythmias in elderly. Future larger studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.007
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAristotle University of ThessalonikiSame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207