Canada Safe Imaging : a Unified Effort For Patient Radiation Safety
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although medical radiation has provided substantial benefits to patients, its use in medicine is significantly increasing, urging greater awareness and stricter safety measures. In 2012 the International Atomic Energy Agency and the World Health Organization launched an initiative titled the u201cBonn Call For Action,u201d (BCA) which outlines ten major strategies for promoting radiation protection. While rules, guidelines, and regulations are laid out, ensuring they are adhered too is essential in creating a radiation-safe experience for each individual.tIn the last 6 years, the extent to which the BCA priorities have been, or may be, implemented has not been widely studied. This study analyzed 19 National Organizations and 41 Provincial organizations that were affiliated with radiation use in medicine, in order to observe diligence in implementing BCA recommendations to evaluate how proficient Canada is - on both a national and provincial level - in strengthening patient radiation safety. All national and provincial organizations involved with medical imaging were identified using an environmental scan and their goals, values, missions, and resources were assessedtOf the 19 National Organizations and 41 Provincial Organizations that were identified, it was evident that no organization was meeting all of the 10 BCA recommendations. Only 10% of National Organizations follow more than 5 of the 10 BCA recommendations while less than 50% of Provincial Organizations were implementing the actions at all.tThere is a need for a cohesive, national initiative to ensure that patients across Canada are safe when exposed to radiation in medicine. As a result, Canada Safe Imaging has been formed as a national organization that brings together many stakeholders to strengthen, and provide contextualized guidelines and tools, for medical radiation protection. Although results have not been replicated outside the original setting, and the initiative's relatively recent implementation makes it difficult to examine improvements at this time, it is imperative that there is a governing body that focuses on establishing safe imaging practices across all organizations. Future studies aim to evaluate the organizations' improvements in knowledge translation and adoption of and sustained adherence to good radiation safety practice and standards across Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.018 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".