MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sleep And Circadian Rhythm Dysfunction In Human Ischemic Stroke : A Systematic Review

2017· other· en· W6908545953 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircadian rhythmSleep (system call)Stroke (engine)Observational studyNeuroimagingMeta-analysisActigraphyDark therapyPsycINFO

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims:Sleep and circadian rhythm pathologies are potentially modifiable risk factors and consequences of ischemic stroke (IS). Experimental sleep and endogenous circadian-rhythm disruption activate deleterious pathophysiological mechanisms which contribute to the pathogenesis and evolution of IS. Sleep and stroke research in humans has primarily focused on obstructive sleep apnea. We conducted a systematic review to assess the bidirectional relationship of non-apnea sleep disorders, sleep architecture, and endogenous circadian-rhythm dysfunction in patients with IS.Methods:Systematic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Extracted variables were chosen based on the STROBE guidelines and appraisal of methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.Results:A systematic search yielded 5192 unique citations, of which 67 observational studies met inclusion criteria. Study quality was generally moderate (n=39) to high (n=27). Thirty-one studies included relevant neuroimaging outcomes. Long-sleep duration (u22658 hours) and non-apnea sleep disorders significantly increase the risk of IS after adjusting for cerebrovascular covariates. Inversely, IS was associated with suppressed sleep architecture and endogenous circadian-rhythms relative to controls which was associated with worse post-stroke severity and recovery.Conclusions:Prolonged sleep duration and non-apnea sleep disorders increase the risk of IS, while sleep architecture and endogenous circadian-rhythms are disrupted after IS and associated with worse post-stroke outcome. However, study methodology (e.g., stroke to sleep and circadian assessment times) and stroke topography were heterogenous thereby limiting generalizable conclusions. Homogenous neuroimaging-driven prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the bidirectionally neuroprotective role of normalized sleep and circadian-rhythms in IS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.007
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207