MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PRO-INFLAMMATORY CYTOKINES, MRI FINDINGS AND QUANTITATIVE SENSORY TESTING IN PATIENTS WITH SCIATICA

2017· other· en· W6908607155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSciaticaMcGill Pain QuestionnaireQuantitative sensory testingRadicular painNeuropathic painPopulationPain catastrophizingLow back painAnxietySensation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The mechanisms of sciatica are thought to be associated with nerve root compression and inflammation, causing neuropathic pain and disability. Several pro inflammatory cytokines have been suggested as promotors of disc herniations and pain. Additionally, microbial pathogens have also been associated with disc herniations and sciatica. Despite the frequent occurrence of sciatica in the general population its underling mechanisms are obscure. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical manifestations and sensory profiles of patients with sciatica, and their relationship to disc microbial infection, levels of disc and blood cytokines, herniation size and location, and pain-related psychological factors.Methods: Fifty-three adult subjects scheduled for lumbar spine surgery due to radicular pain were evaluated using experimental sensory tests (heat, cold and mechanical detection and pain thresholds, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation(CPM)), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Spielberger's Sate-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), DN4 questionnaire and neurological examination prior to surgery. Subjects' blood and disc samples were tested for levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1b, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa) and interferon gamma (IFNg)) and microbial infections using ELISA and rt-PCT. Subjects' MRI scans were assessed for disc herniation size and place using the MSU classification and three-dimensional volumetric analysis.Results: Complete data was available from 40 (75%) patients (15 female) age 44.8u00b116.3 years. Clinical pain (r=0.429, P=0.007) and SF-MPQ (r=0.459, P=0.003) were positively correlated with pain catastrophizing and negatively correlated to CPM (r=-0.437, P=0.006; r=-0.421, P=0.007; for average pain and affective SF-MPQ respectively). ODI was positively correlated with pain ratings (r=0.441, P=0.006) and SF-MPQ (r=0.635, P<0.001) and negatively correlated with painful leg strength (r=-0.358, P=0.023) and CPM (r=-0.369, P=0.019). No correlations were found between pain and disability with MRI assessments, disc and blood cytokine levels and bacterial infection.Conclusion: Psychological factors and pain modulation capacity are more prone to influence pain in patients with sciatica than objective measures of inflammation and imaging findings. Disability in these patients are more likely due to pain intensity and quality than inflammation and imaging findings. The role of mechanical compression and inflammation in the development and maintenance of sciatica pain is still obscure and awaits further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)French-language works237,207