MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6908798009 · doi:10.25940/roper-31091529

CBS News/New York Times Poll: Health Care

2007· other· en· W6908798009 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLL · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careSelf-insuranceHealth policyGovernment (linguistics)Group insuranceInternational healthPublic healthPrescription costsHRHISHealth promotion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

George W. Bush job performance (6); direction of the country (1); Congress job performance (1); most important domestic policies for President and Congress to concentrate on (1); economy (2); opinion of public figures/organizations (2); political party more likely to improve the health care system (1); foreign trade (1); view of the health care system (1); globalization (1); satisfaction with health care (4); more serious problem of health care (1); seriousness of problem of uninsured Americans/children (2); government guarantee of health insurance (2); concern about health care costs (1); maintenance of tax cuts or assurance of access to health care as more important (1); willingness to pay higher taxes for national health insurance (2); quality of personal health insurance in case of national health insurance (1); expansion of S-CHIP (3); fairness of mandatory national health insurance program participation (1); better system of health insurance (1); mandatory health insurance (2); drug company advertisement (3); paid endorsements for doctors by drug companies (2); purchase of lower cost prescription drugs from Canada (1); government vs. private insurance provision of medical coverage/health care costs (2); health care issues to discuss in the 2008 Presidential election (1); confidence in public figures to make the right decisions about health care (4); personal/family health insurance coverage (10); effect of insurance on choice of doctor (1); best informed in household about health-related issues (1); health care costs delaying major household purchases (1); employer-sponsored pension plans (2); concern about health care costs (2); concern about affording retirement (1); recent doctor visits (1); health conditions in household (1); knowledge of own blood pressure (1); personal health (1); Iraq (3); Iran (1); sufficiency of income (1); life expectancy (1); vote in 2004 Presidential election (1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLLFrench-language works237,207