MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910279841 · doi:10.4224/12340901

Ice rubble generation for offshore production structures: current practices overview

2005· report· en· W6910279841 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2005
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCanadian Wood Council
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRubbleSubmarine pipelineBermCurrent (fluid)Production (economics)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ice Rubble Generators and Ice Protection Structures (IRG and IPS, respectively), if successful, would have a major impact on the economics of an offshore production structure in the Beaufort Sea. A hybrid design of these structures has the potential to reduce ice loads by stabilizing the ice rubble surrounding offshore structures during the winter, and by providing a depth-limiting mechanism for summer ice floes. The use of a year-round passive load-reduction technology would significantly reduce the ice loads, which would result in a lower-cost structure. With lower-cost structures, this enables more timely development of frontier gas reserves. Additionally, by both lowering the loads on offshore structures and helping to control the distribution of ice surrounding such structures, the environmental integrity of the protected structure(s) may be increased, leading to increased safety for onboard personnel. This report researches the state-of-the-art use of IRG and IPS to examine innovative technological concepts concerning these structures. The research assembles available information on protective structures that have generated rubble. The information was assembled through a literature review and discussions with national and international personnel involved in the past or at present with this type of work. The majority of structures investigated were designed for use in shallow (approximately 4 m) of water. However a number of concepts show the potential to be adapted for deeper water use. Structures specifically designed to generate rubble have focused on rubblemound berm or barge-based structures, which, although costly for deep water, appear to hold the most promise for a number of locations in the Canadian Beaufort Sea. Additionally, an arrangement of piles designed to hold back rubble or to encourage the formation of a stable ice sheet, comprised of highly loaded torsion piles, could be suitable for the Canadian Arctic. This research will provide guidance for the model test program in Year 2 of the CCTII UGS project, in terms of both concepts and physical size of the generators. The work carried out in this project may encourage the incorporation of a hybrid IRG/IPS into structurally sound design practices for the retrieval of unconventional gas supplies in the Canadian Beaufort Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCFrench-language works237,207