MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6910368450 · doi:10.4224/20133408

Field measurements on multi-year ice in the Beaufort Sea

2011· report· en· W6910368450 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2011
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCanadian Wood CouncilNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceBeaufort seaArctic ice packSea ice thicknessBoreholeSalinityAntarctic sea ice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thickness, strength, salinity and temperature of two, drifting multi-year ice floes in the Beaufort Sea are presented here. Although only two floes were sampled during the two-week voyage on the CCGS Amundsen, the floes characterized a wide spectrum of multi-year ice. Floe B1S1 (74.8°N, 128.3°W) originated from the landfast multi-year hummock field off Prince Patrick Island, 250 km to the northeast. Drill-hole measurements revealed ice thicknesses from 3.6 to 9.3 m, for an average floe thickness of 7.2 m (±1.4 m). The ice was quite warm, saline and weak. The uppermost 3 m of ice had an average temperature of -0.9°C and an average salinity of 1.8‰. The average borehole strength of the 7 m thick ice at the two tested boreholes was 7.3 MPa and 4.5 MPa. A total of 10 controlled ship impacts were conducted with Floe B1S1, during which time the ship penetrated several lengths into the floe. Floe B1S2 (75.0°N, 129.0°W) had drill-hole thicknesses from 5.1 to 15.7 m, and an average thickness of 8.0 m (±2.3 m). The hummocked feature that was tested on this floe was thicker, colder and less saline than the ice tested in Floe B1S1. The uppermost 7 m of the hummock had an average temperature of -2.6°C, an average salinity of 1.0‰ and an average borehole strength of 22.0 MPa. It is not surprising then, that the CCGS Amundsen responded very differently to controlled impacts with Floe B1S2. The first three rams produced just a small imprint in the floe edge; the fourth and final ram caused a crack to propagate by exploiting local weaknesses in the ice. It should not be surprising that the Beaufort Sea pack ice consists of floes with great integrity and relatively weak floes. Different types of floes can, and do, occur in close proximity to one another. Floes that circulate in the Beaufort Gyre for many years become weathered and consolidated. Floes that have been recently deformed, such as Floe B1S1, may be thick, but are not as consolidated. Variable types of ice in the Beaufort Sea were also encountered in August 2009: Barber et al. (2009) noted that the CCGS Amundsen operated in extensively decayed ice on 31 August, yet the CCGS Louis S. St-Laurent encountered a 10 km diameter multi-year floe in the southern Beaufort Sea on 8 August 2009, that the ship spent two hours ramming (B. Molyneux, personal communication from Canadian Ice Service) before it could turn out of the floe. Results from the companion study of the ice impact forces on the CCGS Amundsen when ramming Floe B1S1 and Floe B1S2 will be presented in a separate report. The ice thickness comparison of the drill hole measurements, ice-based electromagnetic (EM) sensor and airborne HEM sensor will be published by University of Manitoba at a later date

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→French-language works237,207→