What Role Does Central Venous Pressure Play in Supporting Cardiac Function in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Exposed to Environmental Challenges?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work examined the role of central venous pressure (CVP), an understudied component of cardiac regulation in fishes, in tilapia faced with a number of environmental challenges. First, we measured the heart rate (fH), cardiac output (Q), stroke volume (SV) and CVP of 30℃-acclimated fish, and those acutely exposed to 24℃, following titrations of zatebradine hydrocholoride (i.e., a pharmacological agent that decreases intrinsic fH). As predicted, fH and Q were ~40% lower in the acutely cooled fish (Q10 ~ 2.3) and both groups had very comparable (i.e., within 10%) values for SV (i.e., SV was temperature insensitive). Interestingly, the CVP of fish at 24℃ was higher than that in 30℃-acclimated fish across all concentrations of zatebradine (i.e., CVP increased from 0.04–0.11 kPa vs. -0.09–0.07 kPa, respectively, as fH was reduced), and this was reflected in a right-shifted relationship between CVP and SV for the 24℃ fish. These data suggest that the acutely cooled tilapia required a higher CVP to attain a similar SV as compared to 30℃ conspecifics. Ongoing experiments are now being performed on 25℃-acclimated tilapia to measure the same cardiovascular parameters (with the addition of oxygen consumption and tissue-oxygen extraction) when: i) exposed to critical thermal maximum (CTMax) and minimum (CTMin) tests at normoxia (100% air sat.); and ii) when exposed to acute/severe hypoxia (30% air sat.) followed by a CTMax test. These data will also be presented at the SEB 2024 conference in Prague.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".