MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6910401416 · doi:10.48336/g87r-fj90

An examination of emotion regulation and health-related quality of life in patients with Multiple Sclerosis

2023· article· en· W6910401416 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisQuality of life (healthcare)DiseasePerspective (graphical)NeurologyAffect (linguistics)Scale (ratio)Mental healthCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, and unpredictable, neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Due to the unpredictability of the disease, and diversity of symptoms, an individual’s perspective of their overall health and well-being may change with an MS diagnosis, labelled health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A reported symptom of MS is emotion dysregulation. Emotion regulation refers to the ability to initiate, inhibit or modulate the occurrence, intensity or duration of feelings. There is limited research to allow clinicians and patients to fully understand the relationship between emotion regulation and HRQOL among patients with MS. Objective: The goal of the present study is to gain a better understanding of the role of emotion regulation in HRQOL among Canadian patients with MS. Specifically, this study aimed to determine if emotion regulation, and its associated constructs, could predict mental and physical HRQOL after controlling for age, gender, and social support. Method: Adults diagnosed with MS participated in this cross-sectional study. Self-report data was collected from June 2015 - April 2018 through online and mail-out survey methods following recruitment using social media and neurology clinic referrals. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12 HS), and a sociodemographic questionnaire were used to collect information on variables of interest. Missing data was handled using multiple imputation. Correlations and hierarchical regressions were performed to determine the predictive value of emotion regulation and its multifaceted constructs (i.e., goals, impulsivity, strategies, clarity, awareness, and non-acceptance) on HRQOL among those with MS. Results: The final sample consisted of 54 participants with MS. Pearson correlation revealed that mental health related quality of life (MHRQOL), but not physical health related quality of life (PHRQOL), significantly decreased as emotion dysregulation increased. Hierarchical multiple regression revealed that emotion regulation predicated MHRQOL over and above age, gender, and social support, with the construct of goaldirected behaviour driving this association. Discussion: The current study provides support that emotion regulation, with a particular focus on goal-directed behaviour, is related to MHRQOL, over and above age, gender and social support. This study did not find the same association between emotion regulation and PHRQOL. The results of the current study highlight the importance of psycho-social intervention that targets emotion regulation in those with MS. Future directions for research might include complementary qualitative analysis of experiences of emotion dysregulation in patients with MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→