MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910411648 · doi:10.48336/n7vk-ks71

Design of a novel biologically inspired robot fish with low cost

2023· article· en· W6910411648 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropulsionRobotUnderwaterFocus (optics)Pipeline (software)AdaptabilityBiomimeticsMobile robotFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Being a novel form of underwater vehicle, the robot fish has the advantages of good maneuverability, quick response, high propulsion efficiency, and low noise. It is widely used in marine biological observation, marine water quality monitoring, submarine pipeline inspection, and exploration. It is one of the hot research topics in the marine field. Compared to the robot fish propulsion mechanism using rigid components, which has problems of no adaptability to underwater motion, and low motion efficiency and inability to imitate the fish body to perform flexible swings, the soft robot fish has higher swimming efficiency, and is the focus of this project. In this work, the design of a novel soft robot fish, with focus on actuation system design, is proposed. The actuation system is based on the motor-driven bevel gear mechanism, which has the advantages of realizing rapid speed regulation, two-way drive, and adjustment range in a small space. One advantage of our design is its straightforward assembly and relatively simple fabrication, which can be completed mainly using 3D printing technology. Three different designs are proposed, based on a comprehensive comparison in terms of efficiency, reliability, and fabrication cost, one design is chosen to be fabricated and tested. The test focuses on the relationship between the swing amplitude, frequency, and swimming speed of the tail. The experiment is mainly divided into two parts: the test of driving the tail of the propulsion mechanism; and the robot fish underwater movement. The test results show that the design achieves the expected motion goal and is engineering feasible, which provides a new solution for the design of the robot fish.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsFrench-language works237,207