MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910556104 · doi:10.48448/ncgj-yk63

Pediatric acute stroke response protocols

2021· other· en· W6910556104 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUnderline Science Inc. · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute strokeStroke (engine)Tissue plasminogen activatorPediatric strokeThrombolysisMagnetic resonance imagingNeurologyContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and purpose: The implementation of acute stroke response protocols has resulted in a decrease in the time to diagnosis of acute stroke in children at select institutions, and this is essential for expanding access to hyperacute therapies. We aim to describe existing pediatric acute stroke response protocols in the United States and Canada to better understand how pediatric centers might implement such protocols within the context of institution-specific structures. Methods: We performed a survey-based study of pediatric stroke specialists focused on institutional acute stroke protocols. The survey queried: hospital demographics; child neurology and pediatric stroke demographics; acute stroke response; imaging; and hyperacute treatment. Results: Forty-seven surveys were analyzed. Most respondents practice at large, free-standing children's hospitals with moderate-sized neurology departments and at least one neurologist with expertise in pediatric stroke. The majority of institutions have an acute stroke pathway or protocol, and all but one of these include the activation of a stroke alert page. Most institutions cite magnetic resonance imaging as the preferred imaging modality and employ abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging protocols for acute stroke imaging. Most institutions also have either computed tomography- or magnetic resonance-based perfusion imaging available. At least one patient had been treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and/or mechanical thrombectomy at the majority of institutions in the year prior to our survey. Conclusions: An acute stroke response protocol is utilized in at least 41 pediatric centers in the United States and Canada. Most acute stroke response teams are multidisciplinary, have annual experience providing intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and/or mechanical thrombectomy, and prefer abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging over computed tomography for stroke diagnosis. Further studies are needed to standardize practices of pediatric acute stroke diagnosis and hyperacute management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnderline Science Inc.French-language works237,207