Stress in adolescence alters guidance cue pathways and impacts dopamine development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Authors: Cecilia Flores¹ ¹McGill University Abstract: Dopamine (DA) connectivity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) continues to unfold until early adulthood, with dramatic organizational and functional changes occurring during adolescence. This delayed development involves long-distance axonal growth of midbrain DA neurons across the adolescent period and is mediated by the Netrin-1/DCC guidance cue pathway. We examined whether repeated social stress in adolescence dysregulates the Netrin-1/DCC pathway, disrupting PFC DA innervation and cognitive control in adulthood. We used a modified accelerated social defeat stress (ASD) model and segregated mice into resilient (RES) and susceptible (SUS) groups by measuring social avoidance in a social interaction test (SIT) 24h after ASD exposure. ASD in adolescence downregulates DCC expression in DA neurons in SUS and RES groups, but its effects on PFC DA development and behavior differ between phenotypes. ASD-induced molecular, cellular and behavioral changes are not observed following ASD exposure in adulthood. While most (~60%) mice exposed to adolescent ASD show RES, most adult mice show stress SUS. Alterations in dopamine development in adolescence may mediate the established link between genetic variance within the Netrin-1/DCC pathway and psychiatric disorders of neurodevelopmental origin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".