MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910841616 · doi:10.5061/dryad.d4vk706

Data from: Effect of IV glyburide on adjudicated edema endpoints in the GAMES-RP Trial

2018· dataset· en· W6910841616 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEdemaAlertnessCerebral edemaIncidence (geometry)Randomized controlled trialClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: In this secondary analysis of the GAMES-RP trial, we report the effect of IV glyburide on adjudicated, edema-related endpoints. Methods: Blinded adjudicators assigned designations for hemorrhagic transformation, neurological deterioration, malignant edema and edema-related death to patients from the GAMES-RP Phase II randomized controlled trial of IV glyburide for large hemispheric infarct. Rates of these endpoints were compared between treatment arms in the per-protocol sample. In those participants with malignant edema, the effects of treatment on additional markers of edema and clinical determiration were examined. Results: In the per-protocol sample, 41 patients received glyburide and 36 received placebo. There was no difference in the frequency of hemorrhagic transformation [n=24 (58.5%) in IV glyburide versus n=23 (63.9%) in placebo, p=0.91], or the incidence of malignant edema [n=19 (46%) in IV glyburide versus n=17 (47%) in placebo, p=0.94]. However, treatment with IV glyburide was associated with a reduced proportion of deaths attributed to cerebral edema [n=1 (2.4%) with IV glyburide vs. n=8 (22.2%) with placebo, p=0.01)]. In the subset of patients with malignant edema, those treated with IV glyburide had less midline shift (p<0.01) and reduced MMP-9 levels (p<0.01). The glyburide treatment group had lower rate of NIHSS increase of ≥4 during the infusion period [n=7 (37%) in IV glyburide versus n=12 (71%) in placebo, p=0.043], and of change in level of alertness [NIHSS subscore 1a; n=11 (58%) versus n=15 (94%), p=0.016] . Conclusions: IV glyburide was associated with improvements in midline shift, level of alertness and NIHSS, and there were fewer deaths attributed to edema. Additional studies of IV glyburide in large hemispheric infarction are warranted to corroborate these findings. NCT01794182. Level of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with large hemispheric infarction, IV glyburide improves some edema-related endpoints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)French-language works237,207