Evidence of hybrid breakdown among invasive hybrid cattails (Typha x glauca)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interspecific hybridization has varied consequences for offspring fitness, with implications for the maintenance of species integrity. Hybrid vigour, when it occurs, can peak in first-generation (F1) hybrids and then decline in advanced-generation (F2+) hybrids. This hybrid breakdown, together with the processes affecting patterns of hybridization and hybrid fitness, determine the evolutionary stability of hybrid zones. An extensive hybrid zone in North America involving the cattails Typha latifolia, T. angustifolia, and their invasive hybrid T. × glauca is characterized by hybrid vigour among F1s, but the fitness of advanced-generation hybrids has not been studied. We compared seed germination and plant growth of T. latifolia (parental L), F1 T. × glauca (F1), hybrid backcrosses to T. angustifolia (bcA) and T. latifolia (bcL), and advanced-generation (F2) hybrids. Consistent with expectations under hybrid breakdown, we found reduced plant growth for F2 hybrids in comparison with F1s (plant height and above-ground biomass) and parental Ls (above-ground biomass). Backcrossed hybrids had intermediate measures of plant growth and bcLs were characterized by reduced seed germination in comparison with parental Ls. Hybrid breakdown could make the formation of F1s in North America finite because (1) hybridization among cattails is asymmetric, with T. angustifolia but not T. latifolia subject to genetic swamping, and (2) T. angustifolia is less common and subject to competitive displacement by F1s. Hybrid breakdown is therefore expected to reduce hybrid frequencies over time, contributing to the long-term maintenance of T. latifolia – the only native cattail in the study region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".