Peripartum allopregnanolone blood concentrations and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuroactive steroids including allopregnanolone are implicated in the pathophysiology of peripartum depressive symptoms (PDS). We performed a systematic review searching PubMed/Embase/PsychInfo/Cinhail through 08/2023 (updated in 07/2024), and conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of studies comparing allopregnanolone blood concentrations in women with versus without PDS at various timepoints during the 2nd and 3rd trimester and the postpartum period, calculating standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses included age, diagnoses of affective disorders before pregnancy, antidepressant treatment, analytical methods, and sample type. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa-scale. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022354495). We retrieved 13 studies with 2509 women (n = 849 with PDS). Allopregnanolone concentrations did not differ between women with versus without PDS at any timepoint (p > 0.05). Allopregnanolone concentrations assessed during pregnancy did not differ for women with versus without PDS at postpartum follow-up (p > 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated higher allopregnanolone concentrations in women with versus without PDS at gestational weeks 21-24 and 25-28 (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.04, 2.11 and SMD = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.26, 1.59 respectively). Moreover, we reported differences between studies using mass-spectrometry combined with chromatography versus immunoassays at gestational weeks 25-28 (p = 0.01) and plasma versus serum samples at gestational weeks 21-24 (p = 0.005). Study quality was rated as poor, good, and fair for two, one and ten studies respectively. PDS were not associated with differences for allopregnanolone concentrations. The use of heterogenous peripartum time points, study cohorts, depression symptom measures and analytical methods has hampered progress in elucidating neuroactive steroid signaling linked to PDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".