MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910969522 · doi:10.48620/78524

Peripartum allopregnanolone blood concentrations and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

2024· article· en· W6910969522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access CRIS of the University of Bern · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllopregnanolonePregnancyNeuroactive steroidPostpartum depressionMajor depressive disorderPolysomnogramGestational hypertension

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroactive steroids including allopregnanolone are implicated in the pathophysiology of peripartum depressive symptoms (PDS). We performed a systematic review searching PubMed/Embase/PsychInfo/Cinhail through 08/2023 (updated in 07/2024), and conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of studies comparing allopregnanolone blood concentrations in women with versus without PDS at various timepoints during the 2nd and 3rd trimester and the postpartum period, calculating standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses included age, diagnoses of affective disorders before pregnancy, antidepressant treatment, analytical methods, and sample type. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa-scale. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022354495). We retrieved 13 studies with 2509 women (n = 849 with PDS). Allopregnanolone concentrations did not differ between women with versus without PDS at any timepoint (p > 0.05). Allopregnanolone concentrations assessed during pregnancy did not differ for women with versus without PDS at postpartum follow-up (p > 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated higher allopregnanolone concentrations in women with versus without PDS at gestational weeks 21-24 and 25-28 (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.04, 2.11 and SMD = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.26, 1.59 respectively). Moreover, we reported differences between studies using mass-spectrometry combined with chromatography versus immunoassays at gestational weeks 25-28 (p = 0.01) and plasma versus serum samples at gestational weeks 21-24 (p = 0.005). Study quality was rated as poor, good, and fair for two, one and ten studies respectively. PDS were not associated with differences for allopregnanolone concentrations. The use of heterogenous peripartum time points, study cohorts, depression symptom measures and analytical methods has hampered progress in elucidating neuroactive steroid signaling linked to PDS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.039
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access CRIS of the University of BernSame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207