Xenodusa reflexa AB, BC, MB, NB, NS, ON, QC, SK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
190. Xenodusa reflexa (Walker) (Illustrations in Hoebeke 1976, Klimaszewski et al. 2018), Table 1 References. Walker 1866. Casey 1886 (as synonyms Lomechusa montana Casey and Atemeles cavus var. hirsutus Wasmann). Hoebeke 1976. Majka and Klimaszewski 2008a. Webster et al. 2009. Klimaszewski et al. 2018, 2020. Distribution. Nearctic. Canada: AB, BC, MB, NB, NS, ON, QC, SK. USA: AZ, CA, CO, CT, IL, IA, MA, MD, MI, MN, MT, ND, NE, NH, NM, NV, NY, OR, RI, SC, UT, VT, WA, WI, WY. Collection and Habitat data. In NH captured in a funnel trap baited with EtOH & a-pinene. Elsewhere reported from ant nests of Camponotus noveboracensis (Fitch), C. laevigatus (F. Smith), C. herculeanus modoc Wheeler, and Formica subpolita Mayr; one specimen from NB was captured in a Lindgren funnel trap in an old mixed forest; several QC specimens were found in December diapausing under a rock with a colony of ants at the border of an agriculture field (Hoebeke 1976, Webster et al. 2009, Klimaszewski et al. 2018). Material. USA, New Hampshire, Merrimack Co.: Wilmot, D.H. Kistner (Hoebeke 1976). Strafford Co.: Dover, 201 Tolend Rd., 43.20434, -70.91486, 12.IX.2022, M.F. DiGirolomo, ex. funnel trap, EtOH & a-pinene, 1 sex? (MFDC).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".