MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911041440 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10041916

VALIDATION OF LAMP ASSAY FOR KLEBSIELLA AEROGENES DETECTION IN THREE VEGETABLE SPECIES

2023· article· en· W6911041440 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsEnterobacter aerogenesDNA extractionIsolation (microbiology)DNANucleic acidExtraction (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

VALIDATION OF LAMP ASSAY FOR KLEBSIELLA AEROGENES DETECTION IN THREE VEGETABLE SPECIES Marija Pavlović2, Mila Djisalov1, Ljiljana Šašić Zorić1, Ljiljana Janjušević1, Željko D. Popović2, Ivana Gadjanski1 1 BioSense Institute, University of Novi Sad, Dr Zorana Đinđića 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; 2 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia Introduction: Klebsiella aerogenes is a foodborne pathogen that contaminates fruits and vegetables. Detecting it in a timely manner is essential to prevent its transmission through contaminated food sources. In this regard, the LAMP method proved to be a robust, highly sensitive and highly specific method for real-time pathogen detection, and thus method of choice for detection of K. aerogenes. Methods: We selected three distinct vegetable types (carrot, cucumber, and lettuce) that were artificially contaminated (spiked) with a bacterial suspension containing 1.5 x 109 CFU/mL of K. aerogenes. DNA extraction from the samples was performed using two approaches: Chelex approach for fast extraction, and Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp., Canada) for spin-column extraction. The total DNA extracted from both methods was subsequently diluted to a concentration of 1 ng/μL and used for the LAMP assay. Results: The results indicated successful detection of K. aerogenes by LAMP using total DNA from both extraction approaches. DNA isolated with a commercial kit reaches the exponential phase of the reaction approximately five minutes earlier compared to DNA obtained by the Chelex method. This can be related to the fact that fast DNA extracts often contain nucleic acid amplification inhibitors. Conclusion: The presented research highlights the remarkable potential of the LAMP methodology that can be efficiently combined with fast DNA extraction methods for in-field detection of pathogens. Key words: LAMP, Klebsiella aerogenes, foodborne pathogens, molecular diagnostics Acknowledgements: This research was funded by MSCA-RISE H2020 project IPANEMA (grant agreement number 872662) and by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development, and Innovations of the Republic of Serbia (grant agreement number 451-03-47/2023-01/200358).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207