MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911142722 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10562061

Promicrogaster constricta Ranjith & Fernandez-Triana 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6911142722 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsCNIB Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeDorsumPlankAdorationContext (archaeology)Malacostraca

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Promicrogaster constricta Ranjith & Fernandez-Triana sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 44379812-06BC-4B97-8ECE-DD8D503EA337 (Figs 1–2) Material examined. Holotype, female INDIA: Arunachal Pradesh, Pasighat, 28°3’54.36” N, 95°10’17.4” E, 217 m. a.s.l., 5–20.x.2022, Malaise trap, coll. A.P. Ranjith (AIMB). Paratypes, three females with same data as holotype (AIMB). Diagnosis. This new species can be differentiated from other Oriental species by the presence of bilobate glossa (Fig. 1B) and smooth, and posteriorly strongly narrowing first metasomal tergite (Fig. 2B). The new species is close to P. grandicula in having fore wing vein r distinctly longer than 2RS and not forming an angle (Fig. 2C), but it differs from P. grandicula in having metatarsus paler than metatibia (darker than metatibia in P. grandicula), gena finely punctate (rugose-punctate in P. grandicula), flagellomere 15 1.4 × as long as wide (2.0 × in P. grandicula), mediotergite 3 1.6 × as long as 2 (2.2 × in P. grandicula) and propodeum punctate medially (smooth in P. grandicula). Description. Female, holotype Body length 3.1 mm, fore wing 3.0 mm. Head. Head 1.2, 2.0 × wider than long anteriorly and dorsally. Face punctate, setose without short sulcus antero-medially, 1.5 × wider than long (Fig. 1B). Clypeus punctate, setose with straight ventral margin (Fig. 1B). Eye setose (Fig. 1B). Malar space 1.1 × basal width of mandible. Glossa distinct, bilobate (Fig. 1B). Frons concave medially, sparsely setose (Fig. 1C). Vertex and occiput smooth, setose (Fig. 1C). OOL: POD: POL = 1.4: 1.0: 1.7. Dorsal length of eye 1.5 × as long as gena. First flagellomere 1.2 × as long as second. First and second flagellomeres 2.4, 2.0 × as long as wide respectively. Flagellomere 15 1.4 × as long as wide. Mesosoma. Mesosoma 1.3 × as long as high. Mesoscutum punctate, setose (Fig. 1E). Middle lobe of mesoscutum moderately elevated (Fig. 1E). Notauli absent (Fig. 1E). Scutellar lunules narrowly crenulate (Fig. 1E). Scutellum sparsely punctate, moderately setose (Fig. 1E). Sides of scutellum smooth and polished (Fig. 1E). Lateral pronotum crenulate medio-posteriorly (Fig. 1D). Mesopleuron mostly smooth punctate anteriorly, sparsely setose anteriorly, heavily setose posteriorly (Fig. 1D). Metapleuron smooth, glabrous, sparsely setose along margins (Fig. 1D). Propodeum medially punctate and bulged, with longitudinal rugae medio-posteriorly, rest smooth without areola (Fig. 1F). Wings. Fore wing 2.5 × as long as wide. Pterostigma 2.5 × as long as wide. Areolet absent (Fig. 2C). Vein r originating slightly after middle of pterostigma, 1.2 × as long as width of pterostigma (Fig. 2C). Vein 1CUa 1.1 × as long as 1CUb. Vein m-cu 1.2 × as long as (RS+M)b. Margin of hind wing vannal lobe setose. Legs. Metafemur 3.2 × as long as wide. Metatibia 4.2 × as long as its maximum width. Metabasitarsus 4.4 × as long as wide. Metasoma. Metasoma as long as head and mesosoma combined (Fig. 1A). Mediotergite 1 narrowing posteriorly, smooth, 1.9 × as long as its maximum width (Fig. 2B). Mediotergite 2 transverse, broadly triangular, smooth, 0.2 × as long as its maximum width (Fig. 2B). Second metasomal suture indistinct (Fig. 2B). Mediotergite 3 smooth, 0.3 × as long as its maximum width (Fig. 2B). Ovipositor long, distinctly decurved apically, 0.4 × as long as fore wing, ovipositor sheath 1.3 × as long as metatibia (Fig. 2A). Colour. Body black except scape dorsally and ventrally, pedicel, maxillary and labial palps, glossa, fore and mid legs except coxa, metatrochanter, metafemur basally and apically, metatibia basal half, metatibial spurs, metatarsomeres, metasoma laterally, mediotergite 1, mediotergite 2 except medio-posteriorly, mediotergites 3–7 posteriorly, ovipositor yellow, tegula, metatibia apical half, mediotergites 2 medio-posteriorly, ovipositor sheath brown. Male. Unknown. Host. Unknown. Distribution. India (Arunachal Pradesh) (Fig. 7). Etymology. The species is named after the mediotergite 1 strongly narrowing posteriorly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→