Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus J. A. Allen 1890
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus J. A. Allen 1890 Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus J. A. Allen 1890, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 3: 90. Type Locality: "Fort Klamath, [Klamath Co.,] Oregon." [USA]. Vernacular Names: Yellow-pine Chipmunk. Subspecies:: Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. amoenus J. A. Allen 1890 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. affinis J. A. Allen 1890 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. albiventris Booth 1947 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. canicaudus Merriam 1903 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. caurinus Merriam 1898 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. celeris Hall and Johnson 1940 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. cratericus Blossom 1937 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. felix Rhoads 1895 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. ludibundus Hollister 1911 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. luteiventris J. A. Allen 1890 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. monoensis Grinnell and Storer 1916 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. ochraceus A. H. Howell 1925 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. septentrionalis Cowan 1946 Subspecies Tamias (Neotamias) amoenus subsp. vallicola A. H. Howell 1922 Distribution: C British Columbia (Canada) south to C California east to C Montana and W Wyoming (USA). Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc). Discussion: Subgenus Neotamias. Reviewed by Sutton (1992, Mammalian Species No. 390). DNA variation and introgressive hybridization between T. amoenus and T. ruficaudus reported by Good et al. (2003) and Demboski and Sullivan (2003).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".