A STUDY ON ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN SHORT TERM AND LONG-TERM HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) poses a significant burden on global healthcare systems, with dialysis being a cornerstone treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While dialysis the Quality of life , it is associated with various complications, including cognitive impairment. This study aims to comprehensively analyze cognitive function in short term and long-term dialysis patients. Methods: The present study included 200 dialysis including short term and long-term patients. Parameters such as Duration of dialysis, Number of hemodialysis, Hemoglobulin, TSAT, Serum Ferritin level, and diagnosis. Questionnaire are used such as, Montreal cognitive assessment, missoloula-vitas quality of life index. Results: The current study is aimed to compare cognitive function in long term and short term dialysis in the dialysis unit 200 patients has participated in analysis of cognitive function in long term and short term dialysis. The study has divided two groups named as short term dialysis (less than 1 year) about 70 patients and Long term dialysis (more than 1 year) about 130 patients. The data parameters were collected including, diagnosis, duration of dialysis ,Number of Dialysis medications, Blood ,pressure, Hb, TSAT, Serum ferritin, EPO administration. The analysis of Cognitive functions was expressed as 2questionnaires. The Mild cognitive analysis tool includes MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESEMENT,whichincludesVisuospatial,Executive,Naming,Memory,Attention,Delayed recall,Orientation.,83% patients scored Above 26 and 17% patients scored below 26.Group A n=65,Mean 22.49,std .deviation 4.580 and St. Error Mean .568 whereas, Group B n=66,mean 23.17 ,St. Deviation 5.374 and St. Error mean.661.Indepentent sample test performed,for Equal variances assumed Lower -2.402 and upper 1.053and Equal Variances not assumed upper -2.400 and upper 1.051. P Valve- ( P <0.0002) Respectively Conclusion : The current study concludes the duration or frequency of dialysis will not affect the cognitive function of dialysis patients. Thus, cognitive function can be improved by frequent analysis by using MOCA assessment tool, Nutritional assessment and psychological status can be monitored every month.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".