MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911342029 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.11388803

Eruga lineata Townes 1960

2024· article· en· W6911342029 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNearctic ecozoneTaxonomy (biology)Key (lock)BiogeographyMonochrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2. Eruga lineata Townes, 1960 (Figs 23–26) Eruga lineata Townes in Townes & Townes 1960: 239 [holotype ♀, USA, Oregon, McMinnville, 19.viii.1947, coll. K.M. Fender, USNM 63701 (USNM); ♀ ♂]. Synonym: Eruga yehi Gauld, 1991 (syn. nov.). References. Carlson 1979: 336 [catalogue]. Gauld 1991: 357 [E. yehi (description); Costa Rica]. Gauld et al. 1998: 122 [E. yehi; in key; Costa Rica]. Hernández-Aguilar et al. 2005: 470 [Mexico (Tamaulipas)]. Khalaim et al. 2018: 20 [Mexico (Veracruz)]. Remarks. According to the original description of E. lineata and key to the Nearctic species of Eruga by Townes & Townes (1960), Mexican material listed below clearly belongs to this species. Samples of E. lineata from Tamaulipas were compared with material of E. yehi identified by I. Gauld and deposited in the collection of INBio, and all these specimens were found to be conspecific. Thus, we consider the Costa Rican species E. yehi as a junior synonym of E. lineata (syn. nov.). Variation. Female from Tepoztlán (Morelos) possesses hind coxa almost entirely blackish, with only extreme apex pale. Material examined. MEXICO. Tamaulipas: 2 ♀ (UAT) Gómez Farías, Canindo, 1400 m, pan trap, 28– 30.vii.1993, coll. J.B. Woolley. 1 specimen (sex unknown, UAT) Gómez Farías, La Perra, pine forest, 1900 m, 24.x.1998, coll. D.R. Kasparyan. Miquihuana [Municipio], km 21 of highway La Peña – Joya, 2800 m, pine forest, coll. D.R. Kasparyan (all in UAT): 16.viii.2000 (1 ♂), 16.ix.2000 (2 ♂). 1 ♀ (UAT) Tula, Ejido Acahuales, 1400 m, oak forest, Malaise trap, 27.viii–10.ix.2016, coll. E. Ruíz-Cancino & J.M. Coronado-Blanco. Hidalgo: 1 ♀ (UNAM) Huasca de Ocampo, Rancho Santa Elena, Hueyapan River, 20°06’N, 98°31’W, 2330–2535 m, Malaise trap, 21.ix–19.x.2010, coll. A. Contreras et al. D.F.: 1 ♂ (UNAM) Ciudad de México, Jardin Botánico UNAM, 19.31502, -99.19414, 1328 m, 18.xi.2013, coll. H. Clebsch. Tlaxcala: 1 ♀ (UAT) 15 km SSE of Apizaco, north slope of La Malinche volcano, 2550–3000 m, pine forest, 1–2.x.2016, coll. A.I. Khalaim. 2 ♀ (UAT) same locatity and collector, 3300 m, pine forest, 19.iv.2022. 1 ♀ (UNAM) Nanacamilpa, San Felipe Hidalgo, Bosque Magico de Piedra Canteada, Santuario de las Luciérnagas, 19°27.32’N, 98°36.02’W, 2855 m, 16.ix.2017, coll. Y. Marquez. Morelos: 1 ♀ (ZISP) N of Cuernavaca, 19°01.154’N, 99°15.888’W, 2420 m, 28.x.2011, coll. A.I. Khalaim. 1 ♀ (ZISP) N of Tepoztlán, path to El Tepozteco, 1800–2000 m, 11.x.2014, coll. A.I. Khalaim. Chiapas: 2 ♀ (AEIC) San Cristóbal de las Casas, 7200 ft. (= 2200 m), 27.v.1969, coll. B.V. Petersen. 1 ♀ (TAMU) Municipio San Cristóbal, San Felipe, 7200 ft. (= 2200 m), Malaise trap, 20–25.vii.1990, coll. R.W. Jones. 1 ♀ (TAMU) 4 km W of San Cristóbal, above San Felipe, oak-pine-grass, Malaise trap, 6–15.ix.1990, coll. R.W. Jones. 1 ♀ (TAMU) Reserva El Triunfo, Sendero Palo Gordo, 6400 ft. (= 1950 m), 21.vii.1997, coll. J.B. Woolley. 1 ♀ (UNAM) Cacahoatlán, Ejido Benito Juárez, 1705 m, 15º08’03”N, 92º08’38”W, 7.x–7.xi.2018, coll. R. Cancino & A.M. Luna. Distribution. Canada, USA (Washington and Minnesota to Arizona), Mexico (Tamaulipas, Hidalgo, D.F., Tlaxcala, Veracruz, Morelos, Chiapas), Costa Rica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIchthyology and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→