Bibliographic record
Abstract
Onychomys leucogaster (Wied-Neuwied 1841) [Hypudaeus] leucogaster Wied-Neuwied 1841, Reise in Nord America, Vol. 2: 99. Type Locality: USA, North Dakota, Oliver Co., Mandan village near Fort Clark. Vernacular Names: Northern Grasshopper Mouse. Synonyms: Onychomys albescens Merriam 1904; Onychomys arcticeps Rhoads 1898; Onychomys breviauritus Hollister 1913; Onychomys brevicaudus Merriam 1891; Onychomys capitulatus Hollister 1913; Onychomys durranti Riddle and J. Choate 1986; Onychomys fuliginosus Merriam 1890; Onychomys fuscogriseus Anthony 1913; Onychomys longipes Merriam 1889; Onychomys melanophrys Merriam 1889; Onychomys missouriensis (Audubon and Bachman 1851); Onychomys pallescens Merriam 1890; Onychomys pallidus Herrick 1885; Onychomys ruidosae Stone and Rehn 1903; Onychomys utahensis Goldman 1939. Distribution: S Alberta, S Saskatchewan, and SW Manitoba, Canada, south through much of Great Plains and Great Basin region of USA, to NC Sonora and N Tamaulipas, México. Conservation: IUCN – Data Deficient as O. l. durranti, otherwise Lower Risk (lc). Discussion: Geographic variation and subspecific taxonomy reviewed for C Great Plains (Engstrom and J. Choate, 1979) and for Great Basin region (Riddle and J. Choate, 1986). Biogeographic implications of intraspecific differentiation explored by Riddle and J. Choate (1986) and Riddle et al. (1993). See McCarty (1978, Mammalian Species, 87).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".