Microtus (Mynomes) montanus Peale 1848
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microtus (Mynomes) montanus Peale 1848 Microtus (Mynomes) montanus Peale 1848, Mammalia, in: Repts. U. S. Expl. Surv., Vol. 8: 44. Type Locality: USA, California, Siskiyou Co., headwaters of Sacramento River, near Mt Shasta. Vernacular Names: Montane Vole. Synonyms: Microtus (Mynomes) amosus Hall and Hayward 1941; Microtus (Mynomes) arizonensis Bailey 1898; Microtus (Mynomes) canescens Bailey 1898; Microtus (Mynomes) caryi Bailey 1917; Microtus (Mynomes) codiensis S. Anderson 1954; Microtus (Mynomes) dutcheri Bailey 1898; Microtus (Mynomes) fucosus Hall 1935; Microtus (Mynomes) fusus Hall 1938; Microtus (Mynomes) longirostris (Baird 1857); Microtus (Mynomes) micropus Hall 1935; Microtus (Mynomes) nanus (Merriam 1891); Microtus (Mynomes) nevadensis Bailey 1898; Microtus (Mynomes) nexus Hall and Hayward 1941; Microtus (Mynomes) pratincolus Hall and Kelson 1951; Microtus (Mynomes) rivularis Bailey 1898; Microtus (Mynomes) undosus Hall 1935; Microtus (Mynomes) yosemite Grinnell 1914; Microtus (Mynomes) zygomaticus S. Anderson 1954. Distribution: Cascade, Sierra Nevada, and Rocky Mountain ranges: SC British Columbia, Canada, south to EC California, S Utah, and NC New Mexico, USA; disjunct populations in S Nevada, EC Arizona, and WC New Mexico (Frey et al., 1995). Conservation: IUCN – Data Deficient as M. m. codiensis and M. m. zygomaticus, Vulnerable as M. m. fucosus and M. m. nevadensis, Lower Risk (nt) as M. m. arizonensis and M. m. rivularis, otherwise Lower Risk (lc). Discussion: Subgenus Mynomes, montanus species group (Zagorodnyuk, 1990). Geographic variation and subspecific classification assessed by Anderson (1959), who viewed M. oeconomus as its sister species. Hooper and Hart (1962) arranged M. montanus with M. pennsylvanicus and M. townsendii, a general relationship corroborated by karyotypic and genic analyses (Modi, 1987; Moore and Janecek, 1990). Two karyotypic morphs reported by Judd et al. (1980), who raised the question of their specific distinction. See Sera and Early (2003, Mammalian Species, 716).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".