MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911507672 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13159025

Dufourea monardae

2014· article· en· W6911507672 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusWildlifeGeorge (robot)YankeeCommon species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dufourea monardae (Viereck) (Figs. 8, 9, 13–15) Conohalictoides monardae Viereck, 1924: 14 (♀ ♂). Halictoides Novae-angeliae (Robertson): Graenicher, 1910: 104 (misdet.) Dufourea (Halictoides) monardae (Viereck): Michener, 1951: 1132 (catalog); Mitchell, 1960: 518 (♀ ♂ redescription); Krombein, 1967: 472 (catalog); Hurd, 1979: 1936 (catalog); Moure & Hurd, 1987: 21 (catalog). Dufourea monardae (Viereck): Dumesh & Sheffield, 2012: 22 (♀ ♂ redescription). This species is oligolectic on Monarda fistulosa L. (Lamiaceae) (Bouseman, 1976). Graenicher (1910) recorded this species (as Halictoides Novae-angeliae) on Agastache foeniculum Pursh (Kuntze) (Lamiaceae), additional non- Monarda records include: Arctium minus Bernh. (Asteraceae) and Leonurus cardiac L. (Lamiaceae). Although the floral host is abundant, this species is relatively uncommon in collections. Nevertheless, D. monardae is the most commonly collected member of the genus in Michigan. The species is known to occur through parts of the Midwest, northeast and southeast USA, as well as Ontario, Canada (Mitchell, 1960; Bouseman, 1976; Wolf & Ascher, 2009; Dumesh & Sheffield, 2012). Dufourea monardae has been collected in relative abundance at the Edwin S. George Reserve in Livingston County (Bouseman, 1976; Evans, 1986). Additional records of the species are from the following localities: Allegan Co.: Allegan State Forest, 30 July 1970 [MSUC]; Barry Co.: Yankee Springs Game Area, 13 July 1959 [MSUC]; Cass Co.: Edward Lowe Foundation, 22 July 2013 [MSUC]; Clinton Co.: Bath, 20 July 1963 [MSUC]; Rose Lake Wildlife Experiment Station, 14 August 1979 [MSUC]; Dickinson Co.: T 40 N R 30 Sec. 7, 31 July 1983 [BBSL]; Huron Co.: 5 km NE of Gagetown, 30 July 2009 [MSUC]; Ingham Co.: no locality, 17 August 1948 [MSUC]; East Lansing, 25 July 1960 [MSUC]; Mason, 1 August 2012 [MSUC]; Iona Co.: no locality, 14 July 1957; Kalamazoo Co.: Gull Lake Biological Station, 19 July 1965, 23 July 1960, 16 August 1960 [MSUC]; Kalamazoo, 18 August 1963 [MSUC]; Kalamazoo, 4 mi. W, 4 August 1963 [MSUC]; Livingston Co.: Gregory State Game Area, Sheets Lake, 26 July 1991 [BBSL]; Midland Co.: no locality, 17–27 July 1960 [MSUC]; Newaygo Co.: Croton, 4 August 1973 [MSUC]; Oakland Co.: Pontiac Recreation Area, 28 July 1972 [MSUC]; Shiawassee Co.: Rose Lake Research Area, 29 July 1993 [BBSL]; Washtenaw Co: Mud Lake Bog, 17–20 July 1971 [SEMC] (Fig. 24). The bee is evidently widespread in Michigan. The host plant, M. fistulosa, occurs throughout the state, having been record in 75 counties (Reznicek et al., 2011). Flight records range from July to late August (Evans, 1986).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→