Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dipodomys ordii Woodhouse 1853 Dipodomys ordii Woodhouse 1853, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 6: 224. Type Locality: USA, Texas, El Paso Co., El Paso. Vernacular Names: Ord's Kangaroo Rat. Subspecies:: Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. ordii Woodhouse 1853 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. celeripes Durrant and Hall 1939 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. chapmani Mearns 1890 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. cinderensis Hardy 1944 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. cineraceus Goldman 1939 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. columbianus Merriam 1894 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. cupidineus Goldman 1924 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. durranti Setzer 1952 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. evexus Goldman 1933 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. extractus Setzer 1949 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. fetosus Durrant and Hall 1939 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. fremonti Durrant and Setzer 1945 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. inaquosus Hall 1941 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. longipes Merriam 1890 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. luteolus Goldman 1917 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. marshalli Goldman 1937 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. medius Setzer 1949 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. monoensis Grinnell 1919 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. montanus Baird 1855 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. nexilis Goldman 1933 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. obscurus J. A. Allen 1903 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. oklahomae Trowbridge and Whitaker 1940 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. pallidus Durrant and Setzer 1945 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. palmeri J. A. Allen 1891 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. panguitchensis Hardy 1942 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. priscus Hoffmeister 1942 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. pullus Anderson 1972 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. richardsoni J. A. Allen 1891 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. sanrafaeli Durrant and Setzer 1945 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. terrosus Hoffmeister 1942 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. uintensis Durrant and Setzer 1945 Subspecies Dipodomys ordii subsp. utahensis Merriam 1904 Distribution: SW Saskatchewan and SE Alberta (Canada) and SE Washington south through Great Plains and intermontane basins of W USA, to Mexican Plateau as far south as Hidalgo (Mexico). Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc). Discussion: Revised by Setzer (1949) and reviewed by Garrison and Best (1990, Mammalian Species No. 353); subspecies follow Williams et al. (1993). Does not include compactus, see Schmidly and Hendricks (1976), Baumgardner and Schmidly (1981), and comment under that species. Williams et al. (1993) provide a list of what they consider as valid subspecies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".